Suppr超能文献

加替沙星与氯霉素治疗单纯性肠热病的疗效比较:一项开放标签、随机、对照临床试验。

Gatifloxacin versus chloramphenicol for uncomplicated enteric fever: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

机构信息

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;11(6):445-54. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70089-5. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate whether gatifloxacin, a new generation and affordable fluoroquinolone, is better than chloramphenicol for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever in children and adults.

METHODS

We did an open-label randomised superiority trial at Patan Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, to investigate whether gatifloxacin is more effective than chloramphenicol for treating uncomplicated enteric fever. Children and adults clinically diagnosed with enteric fever received either gatifloxacin (10 mg/kg) once a day for 7 days, or chloramphenicol (75 mg/kg per day) in four divided doses for 14 days. Patients were randomly allocated treatment (1:1) in blocks of 50, without stratification. Allocations were placed in sealed envelopes opened by the study physician once a patient was enrolled into the trial. Masking was not possible because of the different formulations and ways of giving the two drugs. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, which consisted of at least one of the following: persistent fever at day 10, need for rescue treatment, microbiological failure, relapse until day 31, and enteric-fever-related complications. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients randomly allocated treatment and reported separately for culture-positive patients and for all patients. Secondary outcome measures were fever clearance time, late relapse, and faecal carriage. The trial is registered on controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN 53258327.

FINDINGS

844 patients with a median age of 16 (IQR 9-22) years were enrolled in the trial and randomly allocated a treatment. 352 patients had blood-culture-confirmed enteric fever: 175 were treated with chloramphenicol and 177 with gatifloxacin. 14 patients had treatment failure in the chloramphenicol group, compared with 12 in the gatifloxacin group (hazard ratio [HR] of time to failure 0·86, 95% CI 0·40-1·86, p=0·70). The median time to fever clearance was 3·95 days (95% CI 3·68-4·68) in the chloramphenicol group and 3·90 days (3·58-4·27) in the gatifloxacin group (HR 1·06, 0·86-1·32, p=0·59). At 1 month only, three of 148 patients were stool-culture positive in the chloramphenicol group and none in the gatifloxacin group. At the end of 3 months only one person had a positive stool culture in the chloramphenicol group. There were no other positive stool cultures even at the end of 6 months. Late relapses were noted in three of 175 patients in the culture-confirmed chloramphenicol group and two of 177 in the gatifloxacin group. There were no culture-positive relapses after day 62. 99 patients (24%) experienced 168 adverse events in the chloramphenicol group and 59 (14%) experienced 73 events in the gatifloxacin group.

INTERPRETATION

Although no more efficacious than chloramphenicol, gatifloxacin should be the preferred treatment for enteric fever in developing countries because of its shorter treatment duration and fewer adverse events.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust.

摘要

背景

我们旨在研究新型、价格合理的氟喹诺酮类药物加替沙星是否优于氯霉素,用于治疗儿童和成人的非复杂性肠热病。

方法

我们在尼泊尔加德满都的巴丹医院进行了一项开放性标签、随机优效性试验,以调查加替沙星是否比氯霉素更有效地治疗非复杂性肠热病。临床诊断为肠热病的儿童和成人每天接受一次加替沙星(10mg/kg)治疗 7 天,或每天分四次接受氯霉素(75mg/kg)治疗 14 天。患者以 50 人的区块随机分配治疗(1:1),不进行分层。一旦患者入组试验,就将分配放在密封的信封中,由研究医生打开。由于两种药物的制剂和给药方式不同,无法进行盲法。主要结局测量为治疗失败,包括以下至少一项:第 10 天持续发热、需要抢救治疗、微生物学失败、第 31 天前复发以及肠热病相关并发症。主要结局在所有随机分配治疗的患者中进行评估,并分别报告培养阳性患者和所有患者的结果。次要结局测量为退热时间、迟发性复发和粪便携带。该试验在 controlled-trials.com 上注册,编号为 ISRCTN 53258327。

结果

844 名中位年龄为 16 岁(IQR 9-22)岁的患者入组了该试验,并随机分配了一种治疗方法。352 名患者的血培养确诊为肠热病:175 名患者接受氯霉素治疗,177 名患者接受加替沙星治疗。氯霉素组有 14 名患者治疗失败,而加替沙星组有 12 名(风险比[HR]为失败时间 0.86,95%CI 0.40-1.86,p=0.70)。氯霉素组的退热中位时间为 3.95 天(95%CI 3.68-4.68),加替沙星组为 3.90 天(3.58-4.27)(HR 1.06,0.86-1.32,p=0.59)。仅在 1 个月时,氯霉素组有 148 名患者中有 3 名粪便培养阳性,而加替沙星组没有。在 3 个月时,只有氯霉素组有 1 名患者粪便培养阳性。甚至在 6 个月时,也没有其他阳性粪便培养结果。在培养确认的氯霉素组中有 3 名患者出现迟发性复发,而在加替沙星组中有 2 名。62 天后无复发病例。氯霉素组有 99 名(24%)患者发生了 168 次不良事件,而加替沙星组有 59 名(14%)患者发生了 73 次事件。

结论

虽然不如氯霉素有效,但加替沙星应该是发展中国家治疗肠热病的首选药物,因为它的治疗时间更短,不良事件更少。

资助

惠康信托基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d1/3108101/e9fc9ef3d814/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验