Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Am J Crit Care. 2011 May;20(3):242-50. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011120.
Tooth brushing in critically ill patients has been advocated by many as a standard of care despite the limited evidence to support this practice. Attention has been focused on oral care as the evidence accumulates to support an association between the bacteria in the oral microbiome and those respiratory pathogens that cause pneumonia. It is plausible to assume that respiratory pathogens originating in the oral cavity are aspirated into the lungs, causing infection. A recent study of the effects of a powered toothbrush on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was stopped early because of a lack of effect in the treatment group. This review summarizes the evidence that supports the effectiveness of tooth brushing in critically ill adults and children receiving mechanical ventilation. Possible reasons for the lack of benefit of tooth brushing demonstrated in clinical trials are discussed. Recommendations for future trials in critically ill patients are suggested. With increased emphasis being placed on oral care, the evidence that supports this intervention must be evaluated carefully.
尽管支持这种做法的证据有限,但许多人提倡对危重病患者进行刷牙,将其作为护理标准。随着越来越多的证据支持口腔微生物组中的细菌与引起肺炎的呼吸道病原体之间存在关联,人们开始关注口腔护理。可以合理地假设,源自口腔的呼吸道病原体被吸入肺部,导致感染。最近一项关于电动牙刷对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率影响的研究因治疗组无效果而提前停止。本综述总结了支持对接受机械通气的危重病成人和儿童进行刷牙有效性的证据。讨论了临床试验中刷牙无益处的可能原因。建议对危重病患者进行未来的临床试验。随着对口腔护理的重视程度不断提高,必须仔细评估支持这一干预措施的证据。