Conti A A
Dipartimento di Area Critica Medico Chirurgica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.
Clin Ter. 2011;162(2):133-6.
Medical historiography deals with the concepts, theories, and approaches adopted in the reconstruction and discussion of the history of medicine. The expression has changed through time and according to different scholars and contexts, and it largely depends on the general standpoint from which the medicine of the past is examined. From an Evidence Based History of Medicine perspective, an accurate and complete examination of all available sources must be carried out to draw a picture of the medical theme examined, and, to reach this aim, the issue of the reliability of sources is a preliminary point to take into account. Different historiographical models adopted in the twentieth century will be discussed in this paper. The current ample discussion on the characterising features, methods and challenges of medical historiography documents the wide extent of the debate on the ways available today for the reconstruction of medical history. It also testifies to the relevance, inter-disciplinarity and remarkable vitality of the topic in current academic, scientific and social contexts. Medical and health history is an essential part of current medicine, and the study of the development of medicine through time is an extremely formative experience, which should not be confined to historians and professionals, but which, in appropriate formats and in correct methodological terms, should have full right of citizenship in current health care initiatives.
医学史学涉及医学史重建与讨论中所采用的概念、理论和方法。随着时间的推移,根据不同学者和背景,这一表述有所变化,并且很大程度上取决于审视过去医学的总体立场。从循证医学史的角度来看,必须对所有可用资料进行准确而全面的审视,以勾勒出所研究医学主题的全貌,而为实现这一目标,资料来源的可靠性问题是首先要考虑的要点。本文将探讨20世纪采用的不同史学模式。当前关于医学史学的特征、方法和挑战的广泛讨论,证明了当今重建医学史的可用方法的辩论范围之广。这也证明了该主题在当前学术、科学和社会背景下的相关性、跨学科性和显著活力。医学与健康史是当代医学的重要组成部分,对医学随时间发展的研究是一次极具启发性的经历,这不应该局限于历史学家和专业人士,而应以适当的形式和正确的方法论,在当前的医疗保健举措中拥有充分的参与权。