Suppr超能文献

手术中方形结与滑结的力学性能:对比研究

Mechanical performance of square knots and sliding knots in surgery: comparative study.

作者信息

van Rijssel E J, Trimbos J B, Booster M H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Municipal Hospital Leyenburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;162(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90828-u.

Abstract

Various square knots, sliding knots, and surgeon's knots in mono- and multifilament suture material of different diameters were tested with respect to knot strength and knot security. Loop holding capacity of knots varied from 37.2 to 149.8 N, depending on the kind of knot, knot configuration, kind of suture, suture structure, and suture dimension. On the whole, square knots proved to be more reliable than sliding knots. Knot performance of surgeon's knots was not better than that of square knots. Knot security of three-throw sliding knots and two-throw square knots and surgeon's knots was rather poor. These knots cannot be recommended for clinical use. In smaller diameter mono- and multifilament suture material, knot performance of sliding knots that contained one extra throw was identical to that of square knots. It is concluded that the outcome of the comparison of square knots and sliding knots depends on knot configuration, suture material, and suture size. The implications of these laboratory findings for clinical use are discussed.

摘要

对不同直径的单丝和多丝缝合材料中的各种方结、滑结和外科结进行了打结强度和结安全性测试。结的环扣持力在37.2至149.8牛之间变化,这取决于结的种类、结的构型、缝合线的种类、缝合线结构和缝合线尺寸。总体而言,方结被证明比滑结更可靠。外科结的打结性能并不比方结好。三掷滑结、两掷方结和外科结的结安全性相当差。这些结不推荐用于临床。在较小直径的单丝和多丝缝合材料中,包含一额外掷的滑结的打结性能与方结相同。得出的结论是,方结和滑结比较的结果取决于结的构型、缝合材料和缝合尺寸。讨论了这些实验室结果对临床应用的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验