Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. ZächStr. 4, Nottwil, 6207, Switzerland.
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23-24):2151-65. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.573053. Epub 2011 May 7.
The objective of this paper is to present a framework for systematically describing different approaches to measure environmental factors (EF) and to discuss some strengths and weaknesses of these approaches.
Identification of suitable criteria for ordering measurements of EF was based on an analysis of existing reviews, a qualitative literature review and feedback from experts. Items of selected EF measures were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Experimental and observational designs for the study of EF are distinguished and illustrated with examples. Approaches to study EF are differentiated into those directly measuring an environmental interaction with function and those relying on an independent assessment of environmental features. By applying these criteria, a three-dimensional matrix framework for measurement of EF in observational studies is developed.
The acknowledgement of different measurement approaches to the scientific study of EF is one pathway towards an increased understanding of the connection between environments and functioning. Many different measures may be used to approximate the realities of disabling or enabling environments. This review provides an initial framework for improving our fundamental comprehension of the complexity of the measurement of EF in the context of human health and disability.
本文旨在提出一个系统描述不同环境因素(EF)测量方法的框架,并讨论这些方法的一些优缺点。
根据对现有综述的分析、定性文献综述和专家反馈,确定了用于对 EF 测量进行排序的合适标准。选择的 EF 测量项目与国际功能、残疾和健康分类相联系。
区分了研究 EF 的实验和观察性设计,并举例说明。EF 的研究方法分为直接测量环境与功能相互作用的方法和依赖于环境特征独立评估的方法。通过应用这些标准,开发了一种用于观察性研究中 EF 测量的三维矩阵框架。
承认对 EF 进行科学研究的不同测量方法是增加对环境与功能之间联系的理解的途径之一。许多不同的方法可用于近似导致功能障碍或促进功能的环境的实际情况。本综述为提高我们对人类健康和残疾背景下 EF 测量复杂性的基本理解提供了一个初步框架。