• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人生活质量与环境——迈向波兰残疾人宜居区域的概念。

Individual quality of life and the environment - towards a concept of livable areas for persons with disabilities in Poland.

作者信息

Grabowska Izabela, Antczak Radosław, Zwierzchowski Jan, Panek Tomasz

机构信息

SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10797-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10797-7
PMID:33863294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8052840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [1] highlights the need to create proper socioeconomic and political conditions for persons with disabilities, with a special focus on their immediate living conditions. According to the Convention, these conditions should be built to ensure that persons with disabilities have the potential to enjoy a high quality of life (QoL), and this principle is reflected in the notion of livable areas. The crucial aspect of this framework is the relationship between the individual QoL and the environment, broadly understood as the socioeconomic as well as the technical conditions in which persons with disabilities function.

METHODS

The basic research problem was to assess the relationship between individual QoL for the population with disabilities as a dependent variable and livability indicators as independent variables, controlling for individual characteristics. The study used a dataset from the EU-SILC (European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) survey carried out in 2015 in Poland. The research concept involved several steps. First, we created a variable measuring the QoL for the entire population with disabilities. To measure the multidimensional QoL, we used Sen's capability approach as a general concept, which was operationalized by the MIMIC (multiple indicators multiple causes) model. In the second step, we identified the livability indicators available in the official statistics, and merged them with survey data. Finally, in the last step, we ran the regression analysis. We also checked the data for the nested structure.

RESULTS

We confirmed that the general environmental conditions, focused on creating livable areas, played a significant role in shaping the QoL of persons with disabilities; i.e., we found that the higher the level of the local Human Development Index, the higher the quality of life of the individuals living in this area. This relationship held even after controlling for the demographic characteristics of the respondents. Moreover, we found that in addition to the general environmental conditions, the conditions created especially for persons with disabilities (i.e., services for this group and support for their living conditions) affected the QoL of these individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The results illustrate the need to strengthen policies aimed at promoting the QoL of persons with disabilities by creating access to community assets and services that can contribute to improving the life chances of this population.

摘要

背景

《联合国残疾人权利公约》[1]强调有必要为残疾人创造适当的社会经济和政治条件,尤其关注他们的直接生活状况。根据该公约,这些条件应旨在确保残疾人有潜力享有高质量生活(QoL),这一原则体现在适居区域的概念中。该框架的关键方面是个体生活质量与环境之间的关系,这里的环境广义上理解为残疾人所处的社会经济以及技术条件。

方法

基本研究问题是评估以残疾人群体的个体生活质量作为因变量,以适居性指标作为自变量,并控制个体特征时两者之间的关系。该研究使用了2015年在波兰进行的欧盟收入和生活条件统计(EU - SILC)调查的数据集。研究概念涉及几个步骤。首先,我们创建了一个衡量全体残疾人群体生活质量的变量。为了衡量多维生活质量,我们使用森的能力方法作为一般概念,并通过多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型将其操作化。在第二步中,我们确定官方统计中可用的适居性指标,并将它们与调查数据合并。最后,在最后一步,我们进行回归分析。我们还检查了数据的嵌套结构。

结果

我们证实,专注于打造适居区域的总体环境条件在塑造残疾人的生活质量方面发挥了重要作用;也就是说,我们发现当地人类发展指数水平越高,生活在该地区的个人生活质量越高。即使在控制了受访者的人口统计学特征之后,这种关系依然成立。此外,我们发现除了总体环境条件外,专门为残疾人创造的条件(即针对该群体的服务及其生活条件支持)也会影响这些人的生活质量。

结论

研究结果表明,有必要加强相关政策,通过提供获取社区资产和服务的机会来促进残疾人的生活质量,这些资产和服务有助于改善该群体的生活机遇。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb41/8052840/ba7c2896e22c/12889_2021_10797_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb41/8052840/7566544a56b9/12889_2021_10797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb41/8052840/ba7c2896e22c/12889_2021_10797_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb41/8052840/7566544a56b9/12889_2021_10797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb41/8052840/ba7c2896e22c/12889_2021_10797_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual quality of life and the environment - towards a concept of livable areas for persons with disabilities in Poland.个人生活质量与环境——迈向波兰残疾人宜居区域的概念。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10797-7.
2
How to measure multidimensional quality of life of persons with disabilities in public policies - a case of Poland.如何在公共政策中衡量残疾人的多维生活质量——以波兰为例。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;80(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00981-5.
3
The participatory development of international guidelines for CBR.社区康复国际指南的参与式制定。
Lepr Rev. 2008 Mar;79(1):17-29.
4
The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability.生活质量的概念及其在增强智力残疾领域人权方面的作用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Nov;56(11):1036-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01585.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
An exploratory study examining the relationships between the personal, environmental and activity participation variables and quality of life among young adults with disabilities.一项探索性研究,考察了残疾青年的个人、环境和活动参与变量与生活质量之间的关系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(1):63-73. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.777808. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
Developing human rights based indicators to support country monitoring of rehabilitation services and programmes for people with disabilities: a study protocol.制定基于人权的指标以支持各国对残疾人康复服务和项目的监测:一项研究方案。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015 Sep 24;15:25. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0063-x.
7
"": access to HIV information and services among persons with disabilities in Ghana, Uganda, and Zambia."": 加纳、乌干达和赞比亚残疾人获取艾滋病毒信息和服务的情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(3):335-348. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1498138. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
9
Determinants of Quality of Life in Ageing Populations: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Finland, Poland and Spain.老年人口生活质量的决定因素:芬兰、波兰和西班牙横断面研究的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 19;11(7):e0159293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159293. eCollection 2016.
10
Quality of life and independent living and working levels of farmers and ranchers with disabilities.残疾农民和牧场主的生活质量以及独立生活和工作水平。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Apr;9(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement and determinants of multidimensional urban poverty: Evidence from Shandong Province, China.多维城市贫困的测量与决定因素:来自中国山东省的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0300263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300263. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Change in environmental barriers experienced over a 5-year period by people living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a prospective cohort study.瑞士脊髓损伤患者在 5 年内经历的环境障碍变化:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Apr;59(4):441-451. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00580-7. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Factors that influence the use of community assets by people with physical disabilities: results of participatory mapping in Envigado, Colombia.影响肢体残疾人士使用社区资产的因素:哥伦比亚恩维加多参与式绘图研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8285-9.
3
Disabled People's Organisations increase access to services and improve well-being: evidence from a cluster randomized trial in North India.
残疾人组织增加了服务的可及性并提高了福祉:来自印度北部一项集群随机试验的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8192-0.
4
Growing old in New Towns: A call for research on health and ageing in planned urban environments.新城中的老龄化问题:呼吁对规划城市环境中的健康和老龄化问题进行研究。
Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102166. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102166. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Personalisation schemes in social care: are they growing social and health inequalities?社会关怀中的个性化方案:它们是否加剧了社会和健康不平等?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7168-4.
6
Neighborhood environment and cognitive function in older adults: A multilevel analysis in Hong Kong.社区环境与老年人认知功能:来自中国香港的多层次分析。
Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102146. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102146. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Neighbourhood built environment and physical function among mid-to-older aged adults: A systematic review.邻里建成环境与中老年人群的身体机能:系统评价。
Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102137. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Discrimination and avoidance due to disability in Australia: evidence from a National Cross Sectional Survey.澳大利亚的残疾歧视与回避:来自全国横断面调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6234-7.
9
Factors related to environmental barriers experienced by persons with and without disabilities in diverse African settings.在非洲不同环境中,残疾人和非残疾人所经历的与环境障碍相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186342. eCollection 2017.
10
Healthy urban living: Residential environment and health of older adults in Shanghai.健康城市生活:上海老年人的居住环境与健康。
Health Place. 2017 Sep;47:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.07.007.