Osterman Michelle J K, Martin Joyce A
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Apr 6;59(5):1-13, 16.
This report presents 2008 data on receipt of epidural and spinal anesthesia as collected on the 2003 U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth. The purpose of this report is to describe the characteristics of women giving birth and the circumstances of births in which epidural or spinal anesthesia is used to relieve the pain of labor for vaginal deliveries.
Descriptive statistics are presented on births occurring in 2008 to residents of 27 states that had implemented the 2003 U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth as of January 1, 2008. Analyses are limited to singleton births in vaginal deliveries that occurred in the 27-state reporting area only and are not generalizable to the United States as a whole.
Overall, 61 percent of women who had a singleton birth in a vaginal delivery in the 27 states in 2008 received epidural or spinal anesthesia; non-Hispanic white women received epidural or spinal anesthesia more often (69 percent) than other racial groups. Among Hispanic origin groups, Puerto Rican women were most likely to receive epidural or spinal anesthesia (68 percent). Levels of treatment with epidural or spinal anesthesia decreased by advancing age of mother. Levels increased with increasing maternal educational attainment. Early initiation of prenatal care increased the likelihood of epidural or spinal anesthesia receipt, as did attendance at birth by a physician. Use of epidural or spinal anesthesia was more common in vaginal deliveries assisted by forceps (84 percent) or vacuum extraction (77 percent) than in spontaneous vaginal deliveries (60 percent). Use of epidural or spinal anesthesia was less likely when infants were born prior to 34 weeks of gestation or weighed less than 1,500 grams. Women with chronic and gestational diabetes were more likely to receive an epidural or spinal anesthesia than women with no pregnancy risk factors. Precipitous labor (less than 3 hours) was associated with decreased epidural or spinal anesthesia receipt. longer second stage of labor, and fetal distress (compared with women who receive opiates intravenously or by injection) (1,5,6). Severe headache, maternal hypotension, maternal fever, and urinary retention have also been associated with epidural/spinal anesthesia receipt (5). This report examines the relationship between epidural/spinal anesthesia receipt and selected characteristics of the mother and of labor among vaginal deliveries in the 27-state reporting area as reported on the 2003 U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth.
本报告呈现了2008年通过2003年美国标准出生证明收集的硬膜外麻醉和脊髓麻醉的相关数据。本报告的目的是描述分娩女性的特征以及在阴道分娩中使用硬膜外或脊髓麻醉来缓解分娩疼痛的分娩情况。
对2008年在27个截至2008年1月1日已实施2003年美国标准出生证明的州的居民所发生的分娩进行描述性统计分析。分析仅限于仅在27个州报告区域内发生的阴道分娩中的单胎分娩,并不适用于整个美国。
总体而言,2008年在27个州进行阴道分娩的单胎产妇中,61%接受了硬膜外或脊髓麻醉;非西班牙裔白人女性接受硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的比例(69%)高于其他种族群体。在西班牙裔群体中,波多黎各女性接受硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的可能性最大(68%)。硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的治疗水平随着母亲年龄的增长而降低。随着母亲教育程度的提高而升高。早期开始产前护理增加了接受硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的可能性,医生接生也有同样的效果。在产钳助产(84%)或真空吸引助产(77%)的阴道分娩中,硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的使用比自然阴道分娩(60%)更为常见。当婴儿在妊娠34周前出生或体重低于1500克时,使用硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的可能性较小。患有慢性糖尿病和妊娠期糖尿病的女性比没有妊娠风险因素的女性更有可能接受硬膜外或脊髓麻醉。急产(少于3小时)与接受硬膜外或脊髓麻醉的比例降低、第二产程延长以及胎儿窘迫有关(与静脉注射或注射使用阿片类药物的女性相比)(1,5,6)。严重头痛、产妇低血压、产妇发热和尿潴留也与接受硬膜外/脊髓麻醉有关(5)。本报告根据2003年美国标准出生证明,研究了27个州报告区域内阴道分娩中接受硬膜外/脊髓麻醉与母亲及分娩的选定特征之间的关系。