Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, Broadway, New York, 10027-6902, USA.
Am Psychol. 2011 May-Jun;66(4):315-28. doi: 10.1037/a0023253.
This article considers scientific and public understandings of climate change and addresses the following question: Why is it that while scientific evidence has accumulated to document global climate change and scientific opinion has solidified about its existence and causes, U.S. public opinion has not and has instead become more polarized? Our review supports a constructivist account of human judgment. Public understanding is affected by the inherent difficulty of understanding climate change, the mismatch between people's usual modes of understanding and the task, and, particularly in the United States, a continuing societal struggle to shape the frames and mental models people use to understand the phenomena. We conclude by discussing ways in which psychology can help to improve public understanding of climate change and link a better understanding to action. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).
本文考虑了科学和公众对气候变化的理解,并提出了以下问题:为什么尽管科学证据已经积累,证明了全球气候变化的存在及其原因,而科学界的观点也已经确定,但美国公众的观点却没有改变,反而更加两极化?我们的综述支持人类判断的建构主义观点。公众的理解受到理解气候变化固有难度的影响,也受到人们通常的理解模式与任务之间不匹配的影响,特别是在美国,人们还在继续努力塑造框架和心智模型,以帮助人们理解这些现象。最后,我们讨论了心理学如何帮助提高公众对气候变化的理解,并将更好的理解与行动联系起来。(APA,保留所有权利)。