• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何区分气候怀疑论者、反疫苗接种者和顽固怀疑论者:来自多国公众态度调查的证据。

How to distinguish climate sceptics, antivaxxers, and persistent sceptics: Evidence from a multi-country survey of public attitudes.

作者信息

Clulow Zeynep, Reiner David

机构信息

Energy Policy Research Group, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 2;19(10):e0310325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310325. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310325
PMID:39356647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446448/
Abstract

Distrust in science has been linked to scepticism over vaccines and climate change. Using data from nationally representative surveys administered in eight key countries for global efforts to mitigate climate change and COVID-19 (Australia, Brazil, China, India, Japan, South Africa, the UK and US), we find that distrust in scientists was an important predictor variable for most sceptics, who were sceptical of one issue but not both, in February 2021, when most countries had experienced their first wave of the pandemic. However, the association was significantly weaker among the segment of hardcore sceptics who were both climate sceptics and antivaxxers. We demonstrate that these individuals tended to possess many of the typical sceptic characteristics such as high distrust in social institutions and rightward political orientation, which are (collectively) suggestive of an underlying sceptic mindset rather than a specific distrust of scientists. Our results suggest that different types of sceptics necessitate different strategies to dispel scepticism.

摘要

对科学的不信任与对疫苗和气候变化的怀疑态度有关。利用来自八个关键国家的具有全国代表性的调查数据,这些国家为全球应对气候变化和新冠疫情做出了努力(澳大利亚、巴西、中国、印度、日本、南非、英国和美国),我们发现,在2021年2月,当大多数国家经历了第一波疫情时,对科学家的不信任是大多数怀疑者的一个重要预测变量,这些怀疑者对一个问题持怀疑态度,但对另一个问题不持怀疑态度。然而,在既怀疑气候变化又反对接种疫苗的铁杆怀疑者群体中,这种关联明显较弱。我们证明,这些人往往具有许多典型的怀疑者特征,如对社会机构高度不信任和政治倾向偏右,这些特征(总体上)表明存在一种潜在的怀疑心态,而不是对科学家的特定不信任。我们的结果表明,不同类型的怀疑者需要不同的策略来消除怀疑态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/77a88a65ee75/pone.0310325.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/0388ff6ed4bf/pone.0310325.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/328e0f677ac6/pone.0310325.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/b0f5222324ed/pone.0310325.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/77a88a65ee75/pone.0310325.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/0388ff6ed4bf/pone.0310325.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/328e0f677ac6/pone.0310325.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/b0f5222324ed/pone.0310325.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fc/11446448/77a88a65ee75/pone.0310325.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
How to distinguish climate sceptics, antivaxxers, and persistent sceptics: Evidence from a multi-country survey of public attitudes.如何区分气候怀疑论者、反疫苗接种者和顽固怀疑论者:来自多国公众态度调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 2;19(10):e0310325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310325. eCollection 2024.
2
Embracing and resisting climate identities in the Australian press: Sceptics, scientists and politics.澳大利亚媒体对气候身份的接纳与抵制:怀疑论者、科学家与政治
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Oct;25(7):807-24. doi: 10.1177/0963662515584287. Epub 2015 May 8.
3
How pandemic-related changes in global attitudes toward the scientific community shape "post-pandemic" environmental opinion.大流行相关的全球对科学界态度的变化如何塑造“后大流行”时期的环境观点。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):907-925. doi: 10.1177/09636625231167735. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Public Attitudes on Facebook and Twitter Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: Observational Study.人工智能分析英美两国民众在脸书和推特上对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 5;23(4):e26627. doi: 10.2196/26627.
5
The belief that politics drive scientific research & its impact on COVID-19 risk assessment.认为政治驱动科学研究及其对 COVID-19 风险评估的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0249937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249937. eCollection 2021.
6
A Cross-sectional Survey of Public Knowledge and Perspective on Coronavirus Disease, Vaccination, and Related Research in India during the COVID-19 Pandemic.印度 COVID-19 大流行期间对冠状病毒病、疫苗接种和相关研究的公众知识和观点的横断面调查。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2023 Sep;71(9):19-27. doi: 10.59556/japi.71.0335.
7
Declining Chinese attitudes toward the United States amid COVID-19.在新冠疫情背景下,中国人对美国的态度逐渐发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 21;121(21):e2322920121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322920121. Epub 2024 May 15.
8
Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia.澳大利亚农村地区对气候变化的认知及对信息提供者的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Feb;23(2):170-88. doi: 10.1177/0963662512449948. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
9
Science in the Public Mind: .公众心目中的科学:...
Perspect Biol Med. 2023;66(3):468-477. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2023.a902039.
10
Development and testing of a web module to IMPROVE generic prescribing of oral contraceptives among primary care physicians.开发和测试一个网络模块,以改善初级保健医生普遍开具口服避孕药的情况。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Aug;44(4):579-587. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12853. Epub 2019 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism.理解和应对气候怀疑论的工具包。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;6(11):1454-1464. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
2
Trust in social media and COVID-19 beliefs and behaviours.社交媒体信任度与 COVID-19 信念和行为。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275969. eCollection 2022.
3
Who supports science-related populism? A nationally representative survey on the prevalence and explanatory factors of populist attitudes toward science in Switzerland.
谁支持与科学相关的民粹主义?瑞士一项关于民粹主义科学态度的普遍性及其解释因素的全国代表性调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0271204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271204. eCollection 2022.
4
Multilevel predictors of climate change beliefs in Africa.气候变化信仰的多层次预测因素在非洲。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 5;17(4):e0266387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266387. eCollection 2022.
5
The Vaccination Concerns in COVID-19 Scale (VaCCS): Development and validation.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗顾虑量表(VaCCS)的编制及信效度检验。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0264784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264784. eCollection 2022.
6
An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic.疫情时期的定海神针:新冠疫情之前和期间对科学的信任。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262823. eCollection 2022.
7
The ephemeral effects of fact-checks on COVID-19 misperceptions in the United States, Great Britain and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大新冠错误认知的短暂性事实核查效应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):236-243. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01278-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
A darkening spring: How preexisting distrust shaped COVID-19 skepticism.黯淡的春天:预先存在的不信任如何塑造了对新冠病毒的怀疑态度。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 26;17(1):e0263191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263191. eCollection 2022.
9
Talking to science deniers and sceptics is not hopeless.与科学否认者和怀疑论者交谈并非毫无希望。
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7871):165. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02152-y.
10
Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data.公众对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受程度:使用观察数据的跨国证据,包括水平和个体水平预测因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):e048172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048172.