• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测美国的流感活动:传统监测系统与谷歌流感趋势的比较。

Monitoring influenza activity in the United States: a comparison of traditional surveillance systems with Google Flu Trends.

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 Apr 27;6(4):e18687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018687.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0018687
PMID:21556151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3083406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Google Flu Trends was developed to estimate US influenza-like illness (ILI) rates from internet searches; however ILI does not necessarily correlate with actual influenza virus infections.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Influenza activity data from 2003-04 through 2007-08 were obtained from three US surveillance systems: Google Flu Trends, CDC Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network (CDC ILI Surveillance), and US Influenza Virologic Surveillance System (CDC Virus Surveillance). Pearson's correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to compare surveillance data. An analysis was performed to investigate outlier observations and determine the extent to which they affected the correlations between surveillance data. Pearson's correlation coefficient describing Google Flu Trends and CDC Virus Surveillance over the study period was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.79). The correlation between CDC ILI Surveillance and CDC Virus Surveillance over the same period was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.89). Most of the outlier observations in both comparisons were from the 2003-04 influenza season. Exclusion of the outlier observations did not substantially improve the correlation between Google Flu Trends and CDC Virus Surveillance (0.82; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.87) or CDC ILI Surveillance and CDC Virus Surveillance (0.86; 95%CI: 0.82, 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that while Google Flu Trends is highly correlated with rates of ILI, it has a lower correlation with surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza. Most of the outlier observations occurred during the 2003-04 influenza season that was characterized by early and intense influenza activity, which potentially altered health care seeking behavior, physician testing practices, and internet search behavior.

摘要

背景

Google Flu Trends 旨在通过互联网搜索来估计美国的流感样疾病 (ILI) 发病率;然而,ILI 并不一定与实际的流感病毒感染相关。

方法和发现

从三个美国监测系统获得了 2003-04 年至 2007-08 年的流感活动数据:Google Flu Trends、疾病预防控制中心门诊 ILI 监测网络(CDC ILI 监测)和美国流感病毒监测系统(CDC 病毒监测)。计算了 Pearson 相关系数及其 95%置信区间(95%CI),以比较监测数据。进行了一项分析以调查异常观测值,并确定它们对监测数据相关性的影响程度。在研究期间,描述 Google Flu Trends 和 CDC Virus Surveillance 之间关系的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.72(95%CI:0.64,0.79)。同一时期 CDC ILI 监测和 CDC Virus Surveillance 之间的相关性为 0.85(95%CI:0.81,0.89)。这两个比较中的大多数异常观测值都来自 2003-04 年的流感季节。排除异常观测值并没有显著改善 Google Flu Trends 和 CDC Virus Surveillance(0.82;95%CI:0.76,0.87)或 CDC ILI 监测和 CDC Virus Surveillance(0.86;95%CI:0.82,0.90)之间的相关性。

结论

这项分析表明,尽管 Google Flu Trends 与 ILI 发病率高度相关,但与实验室确诊流感的监测相关性较低。大多数异常观测值发生在 2003-04 年的流感季节,该季节的流感活动早且强烈,这可能改变了寻求医疗保健的行为、医生的检测实践和互联网搜索行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/6d7b69c6c524/pone.0018687.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/87fd7c46f335/pone.0018687.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/178a14fa8939/pone.0018687.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/6d7b69c6c524/pone.0018687.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/87fd7c46f335/pone.0018687.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/178a14fa8939/pone.0018687.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b246/3083406/6d7b69c6c524/pone.0018687.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring influenza activity in the United States: a comparison of traditional surveillance systems with Google Flu Trends.监测美国的流感活动:传统监测系统与谷歌流感趋势的比较。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 27;6(4):e18687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018687.
2
Using Google Trends for influenza surveillance in South China.利用谷歌趋势监测中国南方地区的流感疫情。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055205. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
Correlation between national influenza surveillance data and google trends in South Korea.韩国国家流感监测数据与谷歌趋势之间的相关性。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 5;8(12):e81422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081422. eCollection 2013.
4
Using Google Flu Trends data in forecasting influenza-like-illness related ED visits in Omaha, Nebraska.利用谷歌流感趋势数据预测内布拉斯加州奥马哈市与流感样疾病相关的急诊就诊情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.052. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
The reliability of tweets as a supplementary method of seasonal influenza surveillance.推文作为季节性流感监测补充方法的可靠性。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 14;16(11):e250. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3532.
6
Wikipedia usage estimates prevalence of influenza-like illness in the United States in near real-time.维基百科的使用情况近乎实时地估计了美国流感样疾病的流行程度。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 17;10(4):e1003581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003581. eCollection 2014 Apr.
7
Using Web and social media for influenza surveillance.利用网络和社交媒体进行流感监测。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;680:559-64. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_61.
8
Cumulative query method for influenza surveillance using search engine data.利用搜索引擎数据进行流感监测的累积查询方法
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 16;16(12):e289. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3680.
9
FluBreaks: early epidemic detection from Google flu trends.流感预警:通过谷歌流感趋势进行早期疫情检测。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Oct 4;14(5):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2102.
10
Interpreting Google flu trends data for pandemic H1N1 influenza: the New Zealand experience.解读谷歌流感趋势数据以了解大流行性 H1N1 流感:新西兰的经验。
Euro Surveill. 2009 Nov 5;14(44):19386.

引用本文的文献

1
Infodemiology of Influenza-like Illness: Utilizing Google Trends' Big Data for Epidemic Surveillance.流感样疾病的信息流行病学:利用谷歌趋势大数据进行疫情监测。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 27;13(7):1946. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071946.
2
Using the Baidu index to predict trends in the incidence of tuberculosis in Jiangsu Province, China.利用百度指数预测中国江苏省结核病发病率的变化趋势。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 18;11:1203628. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1203628. eCollection 2023.
3
Influenza surveillance with Baidu index and attention-based long short-term memory model.

本文引用的文献

1
Internet search limitations and pandemic influenza, Singapore.新加坡的互联网搜索限制与大流行性流感
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;16(10):1647-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1610.100840.
2
Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza --- United States, 1976-2007.季节性流感相关死亡人数的估计——美国,1976-2007 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Aug 27;59(33):1057-62.
3
Monitoring influenza activity in Europe with Google Flu Trends: comparison with the findings of sentinel physician networks - results for 2009-10.用 Google 流感趋势监测欧洲的流感活动:与哨点医生网络调查结果的比较——2009-10 年结果。
基于百度指数和注意力机制长短期记忆模型的流感监测。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280834. eCollection 2023.
4
Application of the Internet Platform in Monitoring Chinese Public Attention to the Outbreak of COVID-19.互联网平台在监测中国公众对 COVID-19 爆发关注度中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 28;9:755530. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755530. eCollection 2021.
5
Suggestion of a simpler and faster influenza-like illness surveillance system using 2014-2018 claims data in Korea.建议使用韩国 2014-2018 年的理赔数据,建立一个更简单、更快速的流感样疾病监测系统。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11243. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90511-0.
6
[Strategies in the prevention and control of the Covid-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Environmental factors.].[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的2019冠状病毒病大流行的预防和控制策略。环境因素。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Nov 23;94:e202011115.
7
Online Public Attention During the Early Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study Based on Baidu Index.新冠疫情早期的网络公众关注度:基于百度指数的信息监测研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 22;6(4):e23098. doi: 10.2196/23098.
8
Google Trends-based non-English language query data and epidemic diseases: a cross-sectional study of the popular search behaviour in Taiwan.基于 Google Trends 的非英语语言查询数据与传染病:台湾热门搜索行为的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):e034156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034156.
9
PEACOCK: A Map-Based Multitype Infectious Disease Outbreak Information System.孔雀:一个基于地图的多类型传染病爆发信息系统。
IEEE Access. 2019 Jun 21;7:82956-82969. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924189. eCollection 2019.
10
DOVE: An Infectious Disease Outbreak Statistics Visualization System.DOVE:一种传染病爆发统计可视化系统。
IEEE Access. 2018 Aug 24;6:47206-47216. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2867030. eCollection 2018.
Euro Surveill. 2010 Jul 22;15(29):19621. doi: 10.2807/ese.15.29.19621-en.
4
Interpreting Google flu trends data for pandemic H1N1 influenza: the New Zealand experience.解读谷歌流感趋势数据以了解大流行性 H1N1 流感:新西兰的经验。
Euro Surveill. 2009 Nov 5;14(44):19386.
5
Seasonal and pandemic influenza surveillance considerations for constructing multicomponent systems.构建多组分系统的季节性和大流行性流感监测考量
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009 Mar;3(2):51-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00077.x.
6
Managing and reducing uncertainty in an emerging influenza pandemic.应对和减少新型流感大流行中的不确定性。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 9;361(2):112-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904380. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
Estimates of US influenza-associated deaths made using four different methods.使用四种不同方法对美国流感相关死亡人数的估计。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009 Jan;3(1):37-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00073.x.
8
Aetiology of influenza-like illness in adults includes parainfluenzavirus type 4.成人流感样疾病的病因包括4型副流感病毒。
J Med Microbiol. 2009 Apr;58(Pt 4):408-413. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.006098-0.
9
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.利用搜索引擎查询数据检测流感疫情。
Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1012-4. doi: 10.1038/nature07634.
10
Human metapneumovirus in children with influenza-like illness in Yucatan, Mexico.墨西哥尤卡坦半岛患流感样疾病儿童中的人偏肺病毒
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jan;76(1):182-3.