• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准和纤维肌痛症状量表的日译本:信度和效度。

The Japanese version of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia and the Fibromyalgia Symptom Scale: reliability and validity.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, 3-1-10 Takanodai, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-8521, Japan.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;22(1):40-4. doi: 10.1007/s10165-011-0462-3. Epub 2011 May 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10165-011-0462-3
PMID:21556970
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Japanese version of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR 2010-J), and its quantification scale, the Fibromyalgia Symptom Scale (FS-J). In this study, we divided patients with chronic pain without psychiatric disorders other than depression into two groups according to the 1990 ACR Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia, a fibromyalgia group and a non-fibromyalgia group (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and gout). Patients in both groups were assessed using the ACR 2010-J and FS-J. Seventy-seven of 94 (82%) patients in the fibromyalgia group met the ACR 2010-J, whereas 9% (4/43) of the non-fibromyalgia group did so, with a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive value of 95%, negative predictive value of 70%, and positive likelihood ratio of 8.8. Mean total scores on the FS-J significantly differentiated the fibromyalgia from the non-fibromyalgia group. The scale had high inter-rater reliability and high internal consistency. With a cutoff score of 10, the positive likelihood ratio was 10.1. Our findings indicate that the ACR 2010-J and FS-J have high reliability and validity, and are useful for assessing fibromyalgia in Japanese populations with chronic pain. As regards the positive likelihood ratio, that of the FS-J might be suitable as a positive test.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 2010 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)纤维肌痛初步诊断标准(ACR 2010-J)及其量化量表纤维肌痛症状量表(FS-J)的日本版的可靠性和有效性。在这项研究中,我们根据 1990 年 ACR 纤维肌痛诊断标准,将无精神障碍(除抑郁症外)的慢性疼痛患者分为纤维肌痛组和非纤维肌痛组(类风湿关节炎、骨关节炎和痛风)。两组患者均采用 ACR 2010-J 和 FS-J 进行评估。在纤维肌痛组的 94 例患者中,有 77 例(82%)符合 ACR 2010-J,而非纤维肌痛组的 43 例患者中,仅有 4 例(9%)符合标准,其灵敏度为 82%,特异性为 91%,阳性预测值为 95%,阴性预测值为 70%,阳性似然比为 8.8。FS-J 的总分显著区分了纤维肌痛组和非纤维肌痛组。该量表具有较高的组内一致性和内部一致性。在截断值为 10 时,阳性似然比为 10.1。我们的研究结果表明,ACR 2010-J 和 FS-J 具有较高的可靠性和有效性,可用于评估日本慢性疼痛人群中的纤维肌痛。关于阳性似然比,FS-J 的阳性似然比可能适合作为阳性测试。

相似文献

1
The Japanese version of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia and the Fibromyalgia Symptom Scale: reliability and validity.2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准和纤维肌痛症状量表的日译本:信度和效度。
Mod Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;22(1):40-4. doi: 10.1007/s10165-011-0462-3. Epub 2011 May 10.
2
The Japanese version of the modified ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and the fibromyalgia symptom scale: reliability and validity.日本版改良 ACR 纤维肌痛初步诊断标准与纤维肌痛症状量表:信度与效度。
Mod Rheumatol. 2013 Sep;23(5):846-50. doi: 10.1007/s10165-012-0759-x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
3
The Spanish version of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for fibromyalgia: reliability and validity assessment.2010年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准的西班牙语版本:可靠性和有效性评估。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2 Suppl 96):S55-8. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
4
Validation of the Spanish version of the fibromyalgia rapid screening tool to detect fibromyalgia in primary care health centres.用于在初级保健健康中心检测纤维肌痛的纤维肌痛快速筛查工具西班牙语版本的验证。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2 Suppl 96):S125-8. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia.纤维肌痛的临床和流行病学研究标准和严重程度分级:美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准的修订。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jun;38(6):1113-22. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100594. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
6
The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity.美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准及症状严重程度测量。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):600-10. doi: 10.1002/acr.20140.
7
Fibromyalgia 2016 criteria and assessments: comprehensive validation in a Norwegian population.纤维肌痛 2016 标准和评估:在挪威人群中的全面验证。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Oct 25;20(4):663-672. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0002.
8
Diagnosis of fibromyalgia: comparison of the 2011/2016 ACR and AAPT criteria and validation of the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status.纤维肌痛的诊断:2011/2016 ACR 和 AAPT 标准的比较以及改良 Fibromyalgia Assessment Status 的验证。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 1;59(10):3042-3049. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa061.
9
Validation of the 2011 and 2016 American college of rheumatology diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in a Chinese population.验证 2011 年和 2016 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛诊断标准在中国人群中的适用性。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2249921. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2249921.
10
Fibromyalgia with chronic rheumatic diseases in South Korea: a comparison of clinical and American College of Rheumatology criteria.韩国慢性风湿性疾病伴纤维肌痛:临床与美国风湿病学会标准比较。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;20(12):1922-1926. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12678. Epub 2015 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Weather sensitivity associated with quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia.纤维肌痛患者的天气敏感性与生活质量的关系。
BMC Rheumatol. 2021 May 10;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41927-021-00185-4.
2
Chronic Pain Diagnosis Using Machine Learning, Questionnaires, and QST: A Sensitivity Experiment.使用机器学习、问卷调查和定量感觉测试进行慢性疼痛诊断:一项敏感性实验。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;10(11):958. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110958.
3
Reliability, Factor Structure and Predictive Validity of the Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Scales of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria of Fibromyalgia.
2010年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛标准中广泛疼痛指数和症状严重程度量表的信度、因子结构及预测效度
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 31;9(8):2460. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082460.
4
Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia: Critical Review and Future Perspectives.纤维肌痛的诊断标准:批判性综述与未来展望
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 23;9(4):1219. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041219.
5
A narrative review on the difficulties associated with fibromyalgia diagnosis.关于纤维肌痛诊断相关困难的叙述性综述。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):13-26. doi: 10.1177/1759720X17740076. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Fibromyalgia: A Critical and Comprehensive Review.纤维肌痛:一项批判性与综合性综述。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2015 Oct;49(2):100-51. doi: 10.1007/s12016-015-8509-4.
7
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of duloxetine in Japanese fibromyalgia patients.度洛西汀治疗日本纤维肌痛患者的一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照III期试验。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Aug 22;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0718-y.
8
Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in an Iranian population.验证 2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准在伊朗人群中的适用性。
Rheumatol Int. 2013 Dec;33(12):2999-3007. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2829-6. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
A patient and physician survey of fibromyalgia across Latin America and Europe.一项针对拉丁美洲和欧洲纤维肌痛的患者和医生调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jun 14;14:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-188.
10
The 2010 American college of rheumatology fibromyalgia survey diagnostic criteria and symptom severity scale is a valid and reliable tool in a French speaking fibromyalgia cohort.2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛调查诊断标准和症状严重程度量表在讲法语的纤维肌痛队列中是一种有效且可靠的工具。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 20;13:179. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-179.