School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Sports Biomech. 2011 Mar;10(1):46-58. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2010.547592.
The purpose of this study was to determine the between day reliability of power-time measures calculated with data collected using the linear position transducer or the force plate independently, or a combination of the two technologies. Twenty-five male rugby union players performed three jump squats on two occasions one week apart. Ground reaction forces were measured via a force plate and position data were collected using a linear position transducer. From these data, a number of power-time variables were calculated for each method. The force plate, linear position transducer and a combined method were all found to be a reliable means of measuring peak power (ICC = 0.87-0.95, CV = 3.4%-8.0%). The absolute consistency of power-time measures varied between methods (CV = 8.0%-53.4%). Relative consistency of power-time measures was generally comparable between methods and measures, and for many variables was at an acceptable level (ICC = 0.77-0.94). Although a number of time-dependent power variables can be reliably calculated from data acquired from the three methods investigated, the reliability of a number of these measures is below that which is acceptable for use in research and for practical applications.
本研究旨在确定使用线性位置传感器或力量板独立采集数据,或两种技术结合采集数据计算的功时参数的日内可靠性。25 名男性橄榄球运动员在一周内的两次不同时间分别进行了三次跳蹲。地面反作用力通过力量板进行测量,位置数据通过线性位置传感器进行收集。从这些数据中,每种方法都计算了一些功时变量。结果发现,力量板、线性位置传感器和组合方法都是测量峰值功率的可靠手段(ICC=0.87-0.95,CV=3.4%-8.0%)。功时参数的绝对一致性因方法而异(CV=8.0%-53.4%)。功时参数的相对一致性在方法和参数之间通常具有可比性,并且对于许多变量,其一致性处于可接受水平(ICC=0.77-0.94)。尽管可以从所研究的三种方法采集的数据中可靠地计算出许多与时间相关的功率变量,但这些测量值的可靠性低于在研究和实际应用中可接受的水平。