Harris Nigel K, Cronin J B, Hopkins W G, Hansen K T
Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2010 Mar;50(1):37-42.
Strength and conditioning practitioners appear focussed on developing maximal strength based on the premise that it underpins explosive muscular performance. Investigation into the relationship between strength and a multitude of explosive power measures is limited though. Furthermore, the relationship of explosive force and power with functional performance is unclear.
We examined the inter-relationships between maximal strength and explosive measures of force and power at different loads. Also investigated were the relationships between explosive measures and 10-m sprinting ability. Forty elite-level well-trained rugby union and league athletes performed 10-m sprints followed by bilateral concentric-only machine squat-jumps at 20 and 80%1RM. The magnitudes of the inter-relationships between groups of force measures, power measures and sprint times were interpreted using Pearson correlation coefficients, which had uncertainty (90% confidence limits) of approximately +/-0.25. Measures investigated included peak force, peak power, rate of force development, and some of Zatsiorsky's explosive measures, all expressed relative to body mass.
The relationship between maximal strength and peak power was moderate at 20 %1RM (r=0.32) but trivial at 80 %1RM (r=-0.03). Practically no relationship between any of the explosive measures and 10-m sprint ability was observed (r=-0.01 to 0.06).
Although correlations do not imply cause and effect, we speculate that the common practice of focussing on high levels of maximal strength in a machine squat to improve power output may be misguided. Our results also cast doubt on the efficacy of increasing explosive force and power in a machine squat-jump with the intention of improving sprint ability in well-trained athletes.
力量与体能训练从业者似乎专注于发展最大力量,其前提是最大力量是爆发性肌肉表现的基础。然而,对力量与多种爆发力测量指标之间关系的研究有限。此外,爆发力与功率和功能表现之间的关系尚不清楚。
我们研究了不同负荷下最大力量与力量和功率的爆发性测量指标之间的相互关系。还研究了爆发性测量指标与10米短跑能力之间的关系。40名精英水平、训练有素的橄榄球联盟和联赛运动员进行了10米短跑,随后在相当于1RM的20%和80%的负荷下进行双侧仅向心的器械深蹲跳。使用Pearson相关系数解释力量测量指标组、功率测量指标组和短跑时间之间相互关系的大小,其不确定性(90%置信区间)约为±0.25。研究的测量指标包括峰值力量、峰值功率、力量发展速率以及扎齐奥尔斯基的一些爆发力测量指标,均以体重为相对单位表示。
在相当于1RM的20%负荷下,最大力量与峰值功率之间的关系中等(r = 0.32),但在相当于1RM的80%负荷下微不足道(r = -0.03)。实际上未观察到任何爆发性测量指标与10米短跑能力之间存在关系(r = -0.01至0.06)。
虽然相关性并不意味着因果关系,但我们推测,在器械深蹲中专注于高水平的最大力量以提高功率输出的常见做法可能是错误的。我们的结果也对通过器械深蹲跳增加爆发力和功率以提高训练有素的运动员短跑能力的有效性提出了质疑。