Ruggles Steven
University of Minnesota.
Am Sociol Rev. 2007 Dec 1;72(6):964-989. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200606.
In the mid-nineteenth century, almost 70 percent of persons age 65 or older resided with their adult children; by the end of the twentieth century, fewer than 15 percent did so. Many scholars have argued that the simplification of the living arrangements of the aged resulted primarily from an increase in their resources, which enabled increasing numbers of elders to afford independent living. This article supports a different interpretation: the evidence suggests that the decline of coresidence between generations had less to do with the growing affluence of the aged than with the increasing opportunities of the younger generation. Using data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS), I examine long-run trends in the characteristics of both the older and the younger generations to gain insight into changing motivations for coresidence. In particular, I investigate headship patterns, occupational status, income, and spatial coresidence patterns. I also reassess the potential impact of the Social Security program. I conclude that the decline of intergenerational coresidence resulted mainly from increasing opportunities for the young and declining parental control over their children.
在19世纪中叶,近70%的65岁及以上老人与成年子女同住;到20世纪末,这样做的老人不到15%。许多学者认为,老年人居住安排的简化主要是由于他们资源的增加,这使得越来越多的老年人能够负担得起独立生活。本文支持一种不同的解释:证据表明,代际同住的减少与其说是与老年人日益富裕有关,不如说是与年轻一代机会的增加有关。利用综合公共使用微观数据系列(IPUMS)的数据,我研究了老年和年轻一代特征的长期趋势,以深入了解同住动机的变化。特别是,我调查了户主模式、职业地位、收入和空间同住模式。我还重新评估了社会保障计划的潜在影响。我得出结论,代际同住的减少主要是由于年轻人机会的增加以及父母对子女控制权的下降。