Huth Karin C, Quirling Martina, Lenzke Stefanie, Paschos Ekaterini, Kamereck Klaus, Brand Korbinian, Hickel Reinhard, Ilie Nicoleta
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestr, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Jun;119(3):204-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00825.x. Epub 2011 May 5.
Ozone has been proposed as an adjunct antiseptic in periodontitis therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial effectiveness of gaseous/aqueous ozone, in comparison with that of the established antiseptic chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), against periodontal microorganisms. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Parvimonas micra in planktonic or biofilm cultures were exposed, for 1 min, to gaseous ozone, aqueous ozone, CHX, or phosphate-buffered saline (control). None of the agents was able to substantially reduce the A. actinomycetemcomitans count in biofilm cultures. In contrast, P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, and P. micra could be eliminated by 2% CHX or by ozone gas at 53 gm(-3) . Significantly greater antimicrobial effects were observed against planktonic cultures than against biofilm-associated bacteria. The rate of killing was influenced by the species of bacteria, and by the type and concentration of agent. There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of aqueous ozone (20 μg ml(-1) ) or gaseous ozone (≥ 4 gm(-3) ) compared with 2% CHX but they were more effective than 0.2% CHX. Therefore, high-concentrated gaseous and aqueous ozone merit further investigation as antiseptics in periodontitis therapy. A safe system for applying gaseous ozone into the periodontal pocket that avoids inhalation still needs to be developed.
臭氧已被提议作为牙周炎治疗中的辅助抗菌剂。本研究的目的是调查气态/水性臭氧与已确立的抗菌剂葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)相比,对牙周微生物的抗菌效果。将浮游或生物膜培养物中的伴放线聚集杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏菌和微小单胞菌暴露于气态臭氧、水性臭氧、CHX或磷酸盐缓冲盐水(对照)1分钟。在生物膜培养物中,没有一种试剂能够大幅降低伴放线聚集杆菌的数量。相比之下,牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏菌和微小单胞菌可以被2%的CHX或53克/立方米的臭氧气体消除。与生物膜相关细菌相比,对浮游培养物观察到了显著更大的抗菌效果。杀灭率受细菌种类、试剂类型和浓度的影响。与2%的CHX相比,20微克/毫升的水性臭氧或≥4克/立方米的气态臭氧的有效性没有显著差异,但它们比0.2%的CHX更有效。因此,高浓度的气态和水性臭氧作为牙周炎治疗中的抗菌剂值得进一步研究。仍需要开发一种将气态臭氧安全地应用于牙周袋且避免吸入的系统。