Yin Han, Jiang Cheng, Shi Xiaohe, Chen Yilin, Yu Xueju, Wang Yu, Li Weiya, Ma Huan, Geng Qingshan
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 11;13:762406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.762406. eCollection 2022.
Prehospital delay is associated with non-modifiable factors such as age, residential region, and disease severity. However, the impact of psychosocial factors especially for job burnout on prehospital decision delay is still little understood.
This internet-based survey was conducted between 14 February 2021 and 5 March 2021 in China through the Wechat platform and web page. Self-designed questionnaires about the expected and actual length of prehospital decision time and the Chinese version of Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey, Type D Personality Scale-14, and Social Support Rating Scale were applied. A total of 1,039 general participants with a history of perceptible but tolerable body discomfort were included.
The top six reasons for prehospital decision delay were: (1) endure until self-healing (50.7%), (2) too busy to ask for leave (40.3%), (3) process for seeing a doctor too complicated (35.8%), (4) too tired after work (26.2%), (5) worry about the expenditure (16.6%), and (6) fear of being identified as with serious problem (14.5%). The univariate analyses revealed that older age ( = 0.001), type D personality ( = 0.025), job burnout ( = 0.055), and worrying about expenditure ( = 0.004) were associated with prolonged prehospital decision time, while engaged in medical-related job ( = 0.028) and with more social support ( = 0.066) would shorten the delay. The multivariate analysis using logistic regression model with forward selecting method showed that age [per 10 years, odds ratio (OR) 1.19 (1.09-1.31), < 0.001], job burnout [per 10 points in Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), OR 1.17 (1.04-1.31), = 0.007], and worrying about expenditure [OR 1.75 (1.25-2.47), = 0.001] were the three determinants for prehospital decision delay (>7 days). Mediating effects were analyzed by using bias-corrected percentile bootstrap methods ( = 10,000). Social support was found partially mediated the relationship between the determinants and prehospital decision time. The partial mediating effect of social support accounted for 24.0% of the total effect for job burnout and 11.6% for worrying about expenditure.
Psychosocial factors have a non-negligible impact on prehospital decision delay. The crucial part of prehospital decision delay may be the lack of motivation inside. Job burnout and lack of social support, as two commonly seen features in the modern world, should be given enough consideration in disease prevention and treatment.
院前延误与年龄、居住地区和疾病严重程度等不可改变的因素有关。然而,社会心理因素尤其是职业倦怠对院前决策延迟的影响仍鲜为人知。
本基于互联网的调查于2021年2月14日至2021年3月5日在中国通过微信平台和网页进行。应用了关于院前决策时间的预期和实际时长的自行设计问卷,以及中文版的马氏职业倦怠通用问卷、D型人格量表-14和社会支持评定量表。共纳入1039名有明显但可耐受身体不适病史的普通参与者。
院前决策延迟的六大原因如下:(1)忍耐至自愈(50.7%),(2)太忙没时间请假(40.3%),(3)看病流程太复杂(35.8%),(4)下班后太累(26.2%),(5)担心费用(16.6%),以及(6)害怕被诊断为严重疾病(14.5%)。单因素分析显示,年龄较大(P = 0.001)、D型人格(P = 0.025)、职业倦怠(P = 0.055)和担心费用(P = 0.004)与院前决策时间延长有关,而从事医疗相关工作(P = 0.028)和有更多社会支持(P = 0.066)会缩短延迟时间。采用向前选择法的逻辑回归模型进行多因素分析显示,年龄[每增加10岁,比值比(OR)为1.19(1.09 - 1.31),P < 0.001]、职业倦怠[马氏职业倦怠通用问卷(MBI - GS)每增加10分,OR为1.17(1.04 - 1.31),P = 0.007]和担心费用[OR为1.75(1.25 - 2.47),P = 0.001]是院前决策延迟(>7天)的三个决定因素。采用偏差校正百分位Bootstrap法(n = 10,000)分析中介效应。发现社会支持部分中介了决定因素与院前决策时间之间的关系。社会支持的部分中介效应在职业倦怠的总效应中占24.0%,在担心费用的总效应中占11.6%。
社会心理因素对院前决策延迟有不可忽视的影响。院前决策延迟的关键部分可能是内在动力的缺乏。职业倦怠和社会支持不足,作为现代社会中常见的两个特征,在疾病预防和治疗中应得到充分考虑。