Modlin J F, Onorato I M, McBean A M, Albrecht P, Thoms M L, Nerhood L, Bernier R
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Apr;144(4):480-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150280102022.
Sixty-one children who had previously received three doses of enhanced potency inactivated poliovirus vaccine (epIPV) at 2, 4, and 18 months of age and 56 children who had previously received oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) according to the same schedule were challenged with a single dose of monovalent, type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV1) between 19 and 52 months of age. Before the OPV1 challenge, the previously epIPV-immunized recipients had a geometric mean poliovirus type 1 microneutralization antibody titer (geometric mean titer [GMT]) of 11.1 IU, which was significantly higher than the prechallenge GMT of 2.2 IU among the children who had previously received OPV. Three weeks after the OPV1 challenge, the GMTs for the epIPV-immunized recipients and the OPV-immunized recipients were 35.3 IU and 5.1 IU, respectively. For the epIPV-immunized recipients, both the prechallenge GMT and the postchallenge GMT were dependent on the D antigen content of the vaccine that they had previously received. A fourfold or greater rise in poliovirus type 1 antibody occurred after the OPV1 challenge in 50.9% of the epIPV-immunized children and in 28.6% of the OPV-immunized children; this difference was statistically significant. For both groups, antibody boosts were inversely correlated with the pre-challenge serum antibody titer. However, the epIPV-immunized children consistently were more likely to boost than the OPV-immunized children at equivalent levels of prechallenge antibody. This experience indicated that OPV1 administration effectively raises the level of serum antibody in children previously immunized with three doses of epIPV, especially in children with lower levels of preexisting antibody. This booster response was superior to the booster response of children who received three doses of OPV.
61名曾在2、4和18月龄时接受三剂强化效力灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(epIPV)的儿童,以及56名曾按相同程序接受口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV)的儿童,在19至52月龄时接受单剂单价1型口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV1)攻击。在OPV1攻击前,先前接受epIPV免疫的儿童脊髓灰质炎病毒1型微量中和抗体几何平均滴度(几何平均滴度[GMT])为11.1 IU,显著高于先前接受OPV的儿童攻击前的GMT 2.2 IU。OPV1攻击后三周,接受epIPV免疫的儿童和接受OPV免疫的儿童的GMT分别为35.3 IU和5.1 IU。对于接受epIPV免疫的儿童,攻击前GMT和攻击后GMT均取决于他们先前接种疫苗的D抗原含量。在OPV1攻击后,50.9%接受epIPV免疫的儿童和28.6%接受OPV免疫的儿童脊髓灰质炎病毒1型抗体出现四倍或更大幅度升高;这一差异具有统计学意义。对于两组,抗体增强与攻击前血清抗体滴度呈负相关。然而,在攻击前抗体水平相当的情况下,接受epIPV免疫的儿童始终比接受OPV免疫的儿童更有可能出现抗体增强。这一经验表明,给予OPV1可有效提高先前接种三剂epIPV的儿童的血清抗体水平,尤其是对先前抗体水平较低的儿童。这种加强反应优于接受三剂OPV儿童的加强反应。