Department of Chemistry, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
J Org Chem. 2011 Jun 17;76(12):4818-30. doi: 10.1021/jo200513q. Epub 2011 May 16.
The performance of 250 different computational protocols (combinations of density functionals, basis sets and methods) was assessed on a set of 165 well-established experimental (1)H-(1)H nuclear coupling constants (J(H-H)) from 65 molecules spanning a wide range of "chemical space". Thereby we found that, if one uses core-augmented basis sets and allows for linear scaling of the raw results, calculations of only the Fermi contact term yield more accurate predictions than calculations where all four terms that contribute to J(H-H) are evaluated. It turns out that B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)u+1s is the best (and, in addition, one of the most economical) of all tested methods, yielding predictions of J(H-H) with a root-mean-square deviation from experiment of less than 0.5 Hz for our test set. Another method that does similarly well, without the need for additional 1s basis functions, is B3LYP/cc-pVTZ, which is, however, ca. 8 times more "expensive" in terms of CPU time. A selection of the better methods was tested on a probe set comprising 61 J(H-H) values from 37 molecules. In this set we also included five molecules where conformational averaging is required. The rms deviations were better than or equal to those with the training set, which indicates that the method we recommend is generally applicable for organic molecules. We give instructions on how to carry out calculations of (1)H chemical shifts and J(H-H) most economically and provide scripts to extract the relevant information from the outputs of calculations with the Gaussian program in clearly arranged form, e.g., to feed them into programs for simulating entire (1)H NMR spectra.
评估了 250 种不同计算方案(密度泛函、基组和方法的组合)在 65 个分子的 165 个广泛的“化学空间”内得到的实验(1)H-(1)H 核偶合常数(J(H-H))数据集上的性能。因此,我们发现,如果使用核修正基组并允许原始结果线性缩放,则仅计算费米接触项的计算比评估贡献 J(H-H)的所有四个项的计算可以产生更准确的预测。事实证明,B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)u+1s 是所有测试方法中最好的(而且,除此之外,也是最经济的方法之一),对于我们的测试集,它可以使 J(H-H)的预测值与实验值的均方根偏差小于 0.5 Hz。另一种方法是 B3LYP/cc-pVTZ,它不需要额外的 1s 基函数,但效果也类似,只是在 CPU 时间方面要多 8 倍。我们在包含 37 个分子的 61 个 J(H-H)值的探针集上测试了一组更好的方法。在这个集合中,我们还包括了五个需要构象平均的分子。均方根偏差优于或等于训练集,这表明我们推荐的方法通常适用于有机分子。我们提供了如何最经济地进行(1)H 化学位移和 J(H-H)计算的说明,并提供了脚本,以便以清晰的格式从 Gaussian 程序的计算输出中提取相关信息,例如,将它们输入到用于模拟整个(1)H NMR 谱的程序中。