• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Treatment of small lower pole calculi--SWL vs. URS vs. PNL?

作者信息

Knoll Thomas, Tasca Andrea, Buchholz Noor P

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sindelfingen-Boeblingen Medical Center, University of Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Mar;83(1):6-9.

PMID:21585161
Abstract

According to current guideline recommendations extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) remains the first choice treatment for small and mid-sized renal calculi. However, the results of SWL treatment for lower pole stones can be disappointing whilst more invasive endoscopic modalities, such as flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) are often considered more effective. This article summarizes a point-counterpoint discussion at the 9th eULIS symposium in Como, Italy, and discusses the potential advantages and disadvantages of the different therapeutic approaches.

摘要

相似文献

1
Treatment of small lower pole calculi--SWL vs. URS vs. PNL?
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Mar;83(1):6-9.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.系统评价和冲击波碎石术、逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石的临床疗效的荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?100 至 300 平方毫米肾结石治疗方式比较:体外冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术等效吗?
J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):481-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0208. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
4
Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.输尿管软镜与体外冲击波碎石术治疗 10-20mm 下极结石的比较。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
5
Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.下极肾结石的治疗:冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜检查术的对比
Urol Res. 2006 Apr;34(2):108-11. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
6
Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.冲击波碎石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗下极肾结石的成本效益和效率比较。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1913-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10172.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
7
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,比较非下极肾结石患者体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜碎石术的前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Feb 16;51(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01412-y.
8
Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial.无症状性下极小肾结石:冲击波碎石术、软性输尿管镜检查还是观察等待?一项前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
9
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.经皮肾镜碎石术、软性输尿管镜碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下极结石的临床和成本效益:肾下极结石随机对照试验(PUrE RCT)方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x.
10
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of three-dimensional helical computed tomography for the retrograde flexible ureteronephroscopy in the treatment of lower pole calyx stones.三维螺旋计算机断层扫描在逆行软性输尿管肾镜治疗下极肾盏结石中的价值
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2016 Apr 6;2(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.02.001. eCollection 2016 Mar.