Division of Bacteriology, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011 Aug;53(2):167-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03085.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
We compared the efficiency of universal pre-enrichment broth (UPB), modified Escherichia coli broth containing novobiocin (mEC + n), modified Tryptic Soy Broth (mTSB) and mTSB with novobiocin (mTSB + n) for the enrichment of non-O157 Shiga-toxin-producing E. coli (STEC).
Freeze-injured and control non-O157 STEC (O91, O103, O111, O119, O121, O145 and O165) strains were used to artificially contaminate beef and radish sprout samples, which were then cultivated in each of the four enrichment media. After incubation, STEC strains were detected by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and plating assays. Enrichment in mEC + n was least effective for facilitating the detection of uninjured STEC strains in radish sprouts, while mTSB + n was least effective for enriching freeze-injured non-O157 STEC strains from beef samples for detection by LAMP assay. UPB and mTSB were superior to mEC + n and mTSB + n for the enrichment of non-O157 STEC from food samples.
The enrichment of non-O157 STEC was negatively affected by the addition of novobiocin to enrichment broths.
Novobiocin should not be added to media used for the enrichment of non-O157 STEC in food when cell injury is anticipated.
我们比较了通用预增菌肉汤(UPB)、含新生霉素的改良大肠杆菌肉汤(mEC+n)、改良胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(mTSB)和含新生霉素的改良胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(mTSB+n)在非 O157 型志贺毒素产生大肠杆菌(STEC)富集中的效率。
使用冷冻损伤和对照非 O157 STEC(O91、O103、O111、O119、O121、O145 和 O165)菌株人工污染牛肉和萝卜芽样品,然后在四种增菌培养基中培养。孵育后,通过环介导等温扩增(LAMP)和平板培养检测 STEC 菌株。mEC+n 对萝卜芽中未损伤 STEC 菌株的检测效果最差,而 mTSB+n 对牛肉样品中冷冻损伤非 O157 STEC 菌株的 LAMP 检测效果最差。UPB 和 mTSB 比 mEC+n 和 mTSB+n 更有利于从食品样品中富集非 O157 STEC。
在增菌培养基中添加新生霉素会对非 O157 STEC 的富集产生负面影响。
在预计会出现细胞损伤时,不应该在用于食品中非 O157 STEC 富集的培养基中添加新生霉素。