• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有语音障碍和无语音障碍的学龄前儿童的最小对立体区别与可懂度

Minimal pair distinctions and intelligibility in preschool children with and without speech sound disorders.

作者信息

Hodge Megan M, Gotzke Carrie L

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Oct;25(10):853-63. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.578783. Epub 2011 May 18.

DOI:10.3109/02699206.2011.578783
PMID:21591935
Abstract

Listeners' identification of young children's productions of minimally contrastive words and predictive relationships between accurately identified words and intelligibility scores obtained from a 100-word spontaneous speech sample were determined for 36 children with typically developing speech (TDS) and 36 children with speech sound disorders (SSD) of unknown origin in three age groups (3+, 4+ and 5+ years). Each child's productions of 78-word stimuli were recorded and presented to unfamiliar adults for forced-choice identification. Results of a two-way MANOVA (two groups by three ages) indicated that the TDS group had significantly higher (p < 0.001) percent consonant items correct (PCIC) and percent syllable shape items correct. Stepwise regression analyses revealed significant predictors of intelligibility scores to be PCIC (adjusted R(2) = 0.10, p = 0.04) for the TDS group and PCIC and percent vowel items correct (adjusted R(2) = 0.63, p < 0.001) for the SSD group.

摘要

针对36名发育正常的儿童(TDS)和36名病因不明的语音障碍儿童(SSD),分三个年龄组(3岁以上、4岁以上和5岁以上),确定了听众对幼儿发出的最小对比词的识别情况,以及准确识别的单词与从100个单词的自发语音样本中获得的可懂度分数之间的预测关系。记录了每个孩子对78个单词刺激的发音,并将其呈现给不熟悉的成年人进行强制选择识别。双向多变量方差分析(两组×三个年龄)结果表明,TDS组的辅音项目正确百分比(PCIC)和音节形状项目正确百分比显著更高(p < 0.001)。逐步回归分析显示,对于TDS组,可懂度分数的显著预测因素是PCIC(调整后R(2) = 0.10,p = 0.04);对于SSD组,可懂度分数的显著预测因素是PCIC和元音项目正确百分比(调整后R(2) = 0.63,p < 0.001)。

相似文献

1
Minimal pair distinctions and intelligibility in preschool children with and without speech sound disorders.有语音障碍和无语音障碍的学龄前儿童的最小对立体区别与可懂度
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Oct;25(10):853-63. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.578783. Epub 2011 May 18.
2
Construct-related validity of the TOCS measures: comparison of intelligibility and speaking rate scores in children with and without speech disorders.TOCS 测量的结构效度:有语言障碍和无语言障碍儿童的可懂度和语速得分比较。
J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
3
Assessing phonology in young children.评估幼儿的语音学。
Clin Commun Disord. 1991 Summer;1(2):25-39.
4
Relationship between speech motor control and speech intelligibility in children with speech sound disorders.语音障碍儿童的言语运动控制与言语可懂度之间的关系。
J Commun Disord. 2013 May-Jun;46(3):264-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech-sound disorders.作为对患有基于语音的语音障碍儿童进行干预后的临床结果指标的可懂度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):584-601. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12095. Epub 2014 May 26.
6
Effect of dialect on identification and severity of speech impairment in Indigenous Australian children.方言对澳大利亚原住民儿童言语障碍识别及严重程度的影响。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Feb;26(2):101-19. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.595523. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
7
Measuring phonology in babble and speech.测量咿呀学语和言语中的音韵学。
Clin Commun Disord. 1994 Mar;4(1):1-11.
8
Assessment of intelligibility using children's spontaneous speech: methodological aspects.使用儿童自发言语评估可理解度:方法学方面。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):228-39. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12067. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
Contribution of selected variables to the prediction of speech proficiency for adolescents with cleft lip and palate.
Cleft Palate J. 1986 Jan;23(1):10-23.
10
The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.缺乏经验的听众的感知与儿童/r/发音的声学关联之间的关系。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Jul;26(7):628-45. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.682695.

引用本文的文献

1
Can We Trust Our Ears? How Accurate and Reliable Are Speech-Language Pathologists' Estimates of Children's Speech Intelligibility?我们能相信自己的耳朵吗?言语语言病理学家对儿童言语清晰度的评估有多准确和可靠?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Mar 10;34(2):853-867. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00247. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
A Standardized Protocol for Maximum Repetition Rate Assessment in Children.儿童最大重复率评估的标准化方案。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2019;71(5-6):238-250. doi: 10.1159/000500305. Epub 2019 Jun 28.