Klein Harriet B, Grigos Maria I, McAllister Byun Tara, Davidson Lisa
Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, 10012, USA.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Jul;26(7):628-45. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.682695.
This study examined inexperienced listeners' perceptions of children's naturally produced /r/ sounds with reference to levels of accuracy determined by consensus between two expert clinicians. Participants rated /r/ sounds as fully correct, distorted or incorrect/non-rhotic. Second and third formant heights were measured to explore the relationship between acoustic cues and perceptual judgments. Inexperienced listeners' agreement was greater for correct productions than for distorted or incorrect/non-rhotic productions. In addition, inexperienced listeners' differentiation of intermediate versus fully incorrect /r/ had lower sensitivity and specificity relative to an acoustically defined threshold than experienced listeners' classification. These findings are consistent with results of previous studies highlighting the difficulty in identifying gradations of correctness in misarticulated /r/, and they suggest that this ability may be influenced by clinical experience. Additionally, all listeners were noted to be more consistent in rating vocalic /r/ than consonantal /r/. Implications for clinician training and treatment planning are discussed.
本研究参照两位专家临床医生达成的共识所确定的准确性水平,考察了没有经验的听众对儿童自然发出的/r/音的感知。参与者将/r/音评为完全正确、失真或不正确/非 rhotic 音。测量了第二和第三共振峰高度,以探究声学线索与感知判断之间的关系。没有经验的听众对正确发音的一致性高于对失真或不正确/非 rhotic 发音的一致性。此外,与有经验的听众的分类相比,没有经验的听众区分中等程度错误与完全错误的/r/的敏感度和特异性相对于声学定义的阈值更低。这些发现与之前的研究结果一致,这些研究强调了在识别发音错误的/r/的正确程度等级方面存在困难,并且表明这种能力可能受到临床经验的影响。此外,所有听众在对元音/r/的评级上比辅音/r/更一致。讨论了对临床医生培训和治疗计划的启示。