Perestelo-Perez Lilisbeth, Gonzalez-Lorenzo Marien, Perez-Ramos Jeanette, Rivero-Santana Amado, Serrano-Aguilar Pedro
Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Tenerife, Spain.
Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;6(2):83-90. doi: 10.2174/157488411796151192.
There is growing interest in shared decision-making (SDM) in which the provider and patient go through each phase of the decision-making process together, share treatment preferences, and reach an agreement on treatment choice. Although a majority of the research evaluating SDM has been conducted under "physical" health conditions, patients' participation and SDM for mental health conditions has received increasing interest since the mid 1990s. SDM in mental health care can be more complex than in general health care because that several patient characteristics, health care provider, and system level factors may hinder normalization and implementation of this model into clinical practice. To date, in comparison with other health problems, there are few studies which have assessed SDM in this context. In spite of that, evidence points favorably towards the inclusion of SDM in mental health treatment decisions, given that the majority of patients with mental illness prefer to be involved in the process and wish to have information. However, more studies are needed to provide evidence about the impact of SDM on treatment compliance and health care outcomes. In this overview, the authors present the current state and the future perspectives of SDM in mental health.
共同决策(SDM)正受到越来越多的关注,在共同决策过程中,医疗服务提供者和患者共同经历决策过程的每个阶段,分享治疗偏好,并就治疗选择达成一致。尽管大多数评估共同决策的研究是在“身体”健康状况下进行的,但自20世纪90年代中期以来,患者参与和针对心理健康状况的共同决策受到了越来越多的关注。心理健康护理中的共同决策可能比一般医疗护理更为复杂,因为一些患者特征、医疗服务提供者和系统层面的因素可能会阻碍该模式在临床实践中的常态化和实施。迄今为止,与其他健康问题相比,在这种背景下评估共同决策的研究较少。尽管如此,有证据表明在心理健康治疗决策中纳入共同决策是有利的,因为大多数精神疾病患者更愿意参与决策过程并希望获得信息。然而,需要更多的研究来提供关于共同决策对治疗依从性和医疗保健结果影响的证据。在本综述中,作者介绍了心理健康领域共同决策的现状和未来展望。