• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务相关练习与刺激特定练习。

Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice.

作者信息

Dutilh Gilles, Krypotos Angelos-Miltiadis, Wagenmakers Eric-Jan

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):434-42. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000111.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000111
PMID:21592942
Abstract

When people repeatedly practice the same cognitive task, their response times (RT) invariably decrease. Dutilh, Vandekerckhove, Tuerlinckx, and Wagenmakers (2009) argued that the traditional focus on how mean RT decreases with practice offers limited insight; their diffusion model analysis showed that the effect of practice is multifaceted, involving an increase in rate of information processing, a decrease in response caution, adjusted response bias, and, unexpectedly, a strong decrease in nondecision time. In this study, we aim to further disentangle these effects into stimulus-specific and task-related components. The data of a transfer experiment, in which repeatedly presented sets and new sets of stimuli were alternated, show that the practice effects on both speed of information processing and time needed for peripheral processing are partly task-related and partly stimulus-specific. The effects on response caution and response bias appear to be task-related. This diffusion model decomposition provides a perspective on practice that is more detailed and more informative than the traditional analysis of mean RT.

摘要

当人们反复练习相同的认知任务时,他们的反应时间(RT)总是会减少。杜蒂尔、万德克霍夫、图尔林克斯和瓦根梅克斯(2009年)认为,传统上关注平均反应时间如何随练习而减少的做法提供的见解有限;他们的扩散模型分析表明,练习的效果是多方面的,包括信息处理速度的提高、反应谨慎程度的降低、调整后的反应偏差,以及出乎意料的非决策时间的大幅减少。在本研究中,我们旨在进一步将这些影响分解为特定刺激和与任务相关的成分。一项转移实验的数据表明,在该实验中,反复呈现的刺激集和新的刺激集交替出现,练习对信息处理速度和外周处理所需时间的影响部分与任务相关,部分与特定刺激有关。对反应谨慎程度和反应偏差的影响似乎与任务相关。这种扩散模型分解提供了一个比传统平均反应时间分析更详细、更具信息量的练习视角。

相似文献

1
Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice.任务相关练习与刺激特定练习。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):434-42. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000111.
2
Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms?扩散模型与线性弹道积累模型:反应时间的不同模型对心理机制有不同结论?
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):125-36. doi: 10.1037/a0028189.
3
A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect.实践效应的扩散模型分解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1026-36. doi: 10.3758/16.6.1026.
4
Practice effects on reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields.
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):747-51. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.747.
5
Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.从空间兼容性学习到颜色斯特鲁普任务的任务间学习迁移。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):473-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000115.
6
Implicit task sets in task switching?任务切换中的内隐任务集?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1221-33. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221.
7
Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?练习能否克服心理不应期效应中与年龄相关的差异?
Psychol Aging. 2004 Dec;19(4):649-67. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.649.
8
Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task.触觉与视觉序列反应时任务之间的不对称学习
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Feb;61(2):210-7. doi: 10.1080/17470210701566739.
9
Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis.时间预期与信息处理:基于模型的分析。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):426-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.014. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
10
Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.选择反应中的学习迁移:手部反应特定成分与一般成分的作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jan;130(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making processes in perceptual learning depend on effectors.在知觉学习中,决策过程取决于效应器。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5644. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55508-5.
2
Dynamics of task preparation processes revealed by effect course analysis on response times and error rates.通过对反应时间和错误率的效应过程分析揭示任务准备过程的动态。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 21;14(1):4249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54823-1.
3
Mechanisms of Training-Related Change in Processing Speed: A Drift-Diffusion Model Approach.加工速度中与训练相关变化的机制:一种漂移扩散模型方法。
J Cogn. 2023 Aug 18;6(1):46. doi: 10.5334/joc.310. eCollection 2023.
4
Enhancing Visuospatial Working Memory Performance Using Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.通过右侧背外侧前额叶皮层的间歇性theta波爆发刺激增强视觉空间工作记忆表现
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:752519. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.752519. eCollection 2022.
5
Stability and Change in Diffusion Model Parameters over Two Years.两年间扩散模型参数的稳定性与变化
J Intell. 2021 May 12;9(2):26. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9020026.
6
Slow drift rate predicts ADHD symptomology over and above executive dysfunction.缓慢漂移率可预测 ADHD 症状,甚于预测执行功能障碍。
Child Neuropsychol. 2021 Aug;27(6):834-855. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2021.1902490. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Systematic Parameter Reviews in Cognitive Modeling: Towards a Robust and Cumulative Characterization of Psychological Processes in the Diffusion Decision Model.认知建模中的系统参数综述:迈向扩散决策模型中心理过程的稳健且累积性表征
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 21;11:608287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608287. eCollection 2020.
8
A New Spin on Spatial Cognition in ADHD: A Diffusion Model Decomposition of Mental Rotation.ADHD 患者空间认知的新视角:心理旋转的扩散模型分解。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021 May;27(5):472-483. doi: 10.1017/S1355617720001198. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Strong Effort Manipulations Reduce Response Caution: A Preregistered Reinvention of the Ego-Depletion Paradigm.强烈的努力操作减少反应谨慎:自我损耗范式的预先注册再发明。
Psychol Sci. 2020 May;31(5):531-547. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904990. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Emotion-Cognition Interactions in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Increased Early Attention Capture and Weakened Attentional Control in Emotional Contexts.注意缺陷多动障碍中的情绪-认知相互作用:在情绪环境中增强早期注意力捕捉和减弱注意力控制。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 May;5(5):520-529. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 15.