Einspruch Eric L, Lembach Jennifer, Lynch Bonnie, Lee William, Harper Richard, Fleischman Ross J
RMC Research Corporation, Portland, Oregon, USA.
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011 May-Jun;27(3):E4-9. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e318217b421.
In this randomized trial, the authors compared the instructional quality of instructor candidates trained in instructional methods through an Internet-based versus a traditional classroom-led version of the American Heart Association Core Instructor Course. The self-guided, Internet-based group had significantly higher posttest scores than did the traditional instructor-led group (although not when adjusted for pretest scores). The Internet-based group scores changed from 54% to 67%, exceeding the a priori definition of 8% as a minimally practically significant improvement (instructor-led group scores changed from 49% to 53%). The Internet-based course appeared to be a suitable alternative to the traditional course.
在这项随机试验中，作者比较了通过美国心脏协会核心教员课程的基于互联网版本与传统课堂主导版本接受教学方法培训的教员候选人的教学质量。自我引导的基于互联网的小组在后测中的得分显著高于传统教员主导的小组（不过在对前测分数进行调整后则不然）。基于互联网的小组得分从54%提高到了67%，超过了预先设定的8%这一最低实际显著改善的定义（教员主导小组的得分从49%变为53%）。基于互联网的课程似乎是传统课程的合适替代方案。
