Decker Kathleen, Demers Alain, Chateau Daniel, Musto Grace, Nugent Zoann, Lotocki Robert, Harrison Marion
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e140-7. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
Although the importance of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test screening in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer is well established, in 1994-95 one in 4 women in Manitoba aged 18 to 69 years reported never having had a Pap test or not having had a Pap test in the last 3 years. The objectives of this study were to examine the screening history of women in Manitoba diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer and to explore whether opportunities for screening were missed.
In this case-control study women aged 18 years and older who resided in Manitoba and were diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 1989 and 2001 were each matched by age and area of residence to 5 controls, (N = 4009). Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between Pap test utilization and the likelihood of diagnosis with invasive cervical cancer. Generalized linear models using the negative binomial distribution were used to assess the association between cancer status and rates of prior Pap testing and of opportunities to be screened. Logistic generalized estimating equation models were used for the analysis of physician characteristics.
Forty-six percent of women in Manitoba diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer and 67% of the control group had received a Pap test in the 5 years before the case's diagnosis. After adjustment for age, income and residence, the rate of Pap testing was significantly higher in the control group (rate ratio [RR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-1.73). Conversely, when cervical cancer was the outcome, women who had not had Pap tests were more likely to be diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% CI 2.30-3.30) than women who did have a Pap test. Although women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer had fewer Pap tests, they had had as many opportunities to be screened as controls (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.12). Compared with urban family physicians, rural family physicians were less likely to provide Pap tests (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.80) and specialists were more likely to provide Pap tests (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.30-2.22).
Women who were diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer in the province of Manitoba, Canada, had fewer Pap tests but the same frequency of opportunities to be screened as matched controls. These results reinforce the need to educate women about cervical cancer screening and the importance of receiving Pap tests.
尽管巴氏涂片检查在降低宫颈癌发病率方面的重要性已得到充分证实,但在1994 - 1995年,曼尼托巴省18至69岁的女性中,每4人就有1人报告从未进行过巴氏涂片检查或在过去3年中未进行过该项检查。本研究的目的是调查曼尼托巴省被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌的女性的筛查史,并探讨是否存在错过筛查机会的情况。
在这项病例对照研究中,1989年至2001年间居住在曼尼托巴省且被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌的18岁及以上女性,每人按年龄和居住地区与5名对照进行匹配(N = 4009)。采用条件逻辑回归分析来检验巴氏涂片检查的使用与浸润性宫颈癌诊断可能性之间的关联。使用负二项分布的广义线性模型来评估癌症状态与既往巴氏检查率以及筛查机会之间的关联。采用逻辑广义估计方程模型分析医生特征。
在曼尼托巴省被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌的女性中,46%在病例诊断前5年内接受过巴氏涂片检查,对照组这一比例为67%。在对年龄、收入和居住情况进行调整后,对照组的巴氏检查率显著更高(率比[RR]=1.57,95%置信区间[CI] 1.44 - 1.73)。相反,以宫颈癌为结局时,未进行巴氏涂片检查的女性比进行过该项检查的女性更有可能被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌(比值比[OR]=2.77,95% CI 2.30 - 3.30)。尽管被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌的女性接受的巴氏检查较少,但她们获得的筛查机会与对照组相同(RR = 1.04,95% CI 0.96 - 1.12)。与城市家庭医生相比,农村家庭医生提供巴氏涂片检查的可能性较小(OR = 0.68,95% CI 0.58 - 0.80),而专科医生提供该项检查的可能性较大(OR = 1.70,95% CI 1.30 - 2.22)。
在加拿大曼尼托巴省被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌的女性接受的巴氏涂片检查较少,但获得筛查机会的频率与匹配的对照组相同。这些结果强化了对女性进行宫颈癌筛查教育以及接受巴氏涂片检查重要性教育的必要性。