Suppr超能文献

可扩展临床决策支持标准:需求、现行及新兴标准、差距与进展建议。

Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.

作者信息

Kawamoto Kensaku, Del Fiol Guilherme, Lobach David F, Jenders Robert A

机构信息

Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Box 2914, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:235-44. doi: 10.2174/1874431101004010235. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

Abstract

Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS.

摘要

尽管先进的临床决策支持(CDS)功能有显著改善医疗保健的潜力,但在临床环境中却未得到广泛应用。CDS功能应用有限的一个重要原因是,当前大多数CDS实施都具有特定应用和特定机构的性质。因此,要在更大规模上实现CDS功能,迫切需要开发和采用相关标准,以使现有和新兴的CDS资源能够在多个应用和护理环境中得到更有效的利用。实现CDS有效扩展所需的标准包括:(i)用于表示和交流医疗数据的标准术语和信息模型;(ii)以人类可读和机器可执行格式表示临床知识的标准方法;(iii)利用这些知识资源在各种应用和护理环境中提供CDS功能的标准方法。为满足这些需求,已经存在或正在制定一些标准。然而,仍然存在许多差距和挑战,包括许多标准过于复杂;采用标准方法实现的易于获取的知识资源有限;以及缺乏工具和其他实用资源以促进对现有标准的有效采用。因此,当前CDS标准的未来发展和广泛采用将严重依赖于工具、知识库和其他资源的可用性,这些资源使得采用CDS标准不仅是正确的做法,而且与使用传统的临时方法实施CDS相比,是一条具有成本效益的途径。

相似文献

7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Workflow-driven clinical decision support for personalized oncology.用于个性化肿瘤学的工作流程驱动的临床决策支持
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 21;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):87. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0314-3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
A four-phase model of the evolution of clinical decision support architectures.临床决策支持架构演变的四阶段模型。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Oct;77(10):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验