• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.可扩展临床决策支持标准:需求、现行及新兴标准、差距与进展建议。
Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:235-44. doi: 10.2174/1874431101004010235. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
2
System-agnostic clinical decision support services: benefits and challenges for scalable decision support.与系统无关的临床决策支持服务:可扩展决策支持的益处与挑战
Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:245-54. doi: 10.2174/1874431101004010245. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
3
Design and Development of a Sharable Clinical Decision Support System Based on a Semantic Web Service Framework.基于语义 Web 服务框架的可共享临床决策支持系统的设计与开发。
J Med Syst. 2016 May;40(5):118. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0472-y. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
Lessons Learned from a National Initiative Promoting Publicly Available Standards-Based Clinical Decision Support.从一项推广公开可用的基于标准的临床决策支持的全国性倡议中吸取的经验教训。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):566-574. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769911. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Clinical information system services and capabilities desired for scalable, standards-based, service-oriented decision support: consensus assessment of the Health Level 7 clinical decision support Work Group.面向可扩展、基于标准、面向服务的决策支持所需的临床信息系统服务与功能:卫生信息标准委员会临床决策支持工作组的共识评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:446-55. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
6
Multi-National, Multi-Institutional Analysis of Clinical Decision Support Data Needs to Inform Development of the HL7 Virtual Medical Record Standard.临床决策支持数据需求的多国多机构分析,为HL7虚拟病历标准的制定提供依据。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:377-81.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Design and implementation of a standards-based interoperable clinical decision support architecture in the context of the Korean EHR.在韩国电子健康档案的背景下,基于标准的可互操作临床决策支持架构的设计与实现。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Sep;79(9):611-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.002.
10
Workflow-driven clinical decision support for personalized oncology.用于个性化肿瘤学的工作流程驱动的临床决策支持
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 21;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):87. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0314-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and enablers to implementing and using clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.实施和使用慢性病临床决策支持系统的障碍与促进因素:一项定性系统评价与元聚合分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 28;3(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x.
2
Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.当代慢性病临床决策支持系统的设计、效果和经济结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1757-1772. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac110.
3
Implementation of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support for health systems: a cost-utility analysis.实施药物基因组学临床决策支持系统用于卫生系统:成本效用分析。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2022 May;22(3):188-197. doi: 10.1038/s41397-022-00275-7. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Coordinated use of Health Level 7 standards to support clinical decision support: Case study with shared decision making and drug-drug interactions.协调使用卫生信息交换标准(HL7)以支持临床决策支持:共享决策制定与药物相互作用的案例研究
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 21;162:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104749.
5
Considerations for Designing EHR-Embedded Clinical Decision Support Systems for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Pediatric Emergency Departments.考虑设计电子病历嵌入式临床决策支持系统以用于儿科急诊部门的抗菌药物管理。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Aug;11(4):589-597. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715893. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Iterative heuristic design of temporal graphic displays with clinical domain experts.与临床领域专家一起进行时间图形显示的迭代启发式设计。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Oct;35(5):1119-1131. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00571-2. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
7
Does not compute: challenges and solutions in managing computable biomedical knowledge.无法计算:管理可计算生物医学知识的挑战和解决方案。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Jul;27(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100123.
8
Interrupting providers with clinical decision support to improve care for heart failure.利用临床决策支持打断医疗服务提供者,以改善心力衰竭的护理。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Nov;131:103956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103956. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
Pharmacogenomic clinical decision support design and multi-site process outcomes analysis in the eMERGE Network.在 eMERGE 网络中,药物基因组学临床决策支持的设计和多站点流程结果分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):143-148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy156.
10
Increasing Complexity in Rule-Based Clinical Decision Support: The Symptom Assessment and Management Intervention.基于规则的临床决策支持中日益增加的复杂性:症状评估与管理干预
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Nov 8;4(4):e36. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5728.

本文引用的文献

1
A set of preliminary standards recommended for achieving a national repository of clinical decision support interventions.为建立全国临床决策支持干预措施库而推荐的一套初步标准。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:614-8.
2
The HL7-OMG Healthcare Services Specification Project: motivation, methodology, and deliverables for enabling a semantically interoperable service-oriented architecture for healthcare.HL7-OMG 医疗保健服务规范项目:为医疗保健领域实现语义互操作的面向服务架构提供动力、方法和可交付成果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):874-81. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3123. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
3
A national clinical decision support infrastructure to enable the widespread and consistent practice of genomic and personalized medicine.一个国家临床决策支持基础设施,以推动基因组学和个性化医学的广泛且一致的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Mar 23;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-17.
4
LexGrid: a framework for representing, storing, and querying biomedical terminologies from simple to sublime.LexGrid:一个用于表示、存储和查询从简单到复杂的生物医学术语的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):305-15. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3006. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
5
An architecture for linking medical decision-support applications to clinical databases and its evaluation.一种将医学决策支持应用程序与临床数据库相连接的架构及其评估。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):203-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
6
Lessons learned from adapting a generic narrative diabetic-foot guideline to an institutional decision-support system.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;139:243-52.
7
Assessing the impact of HL7/FDA Structured Product Label (SPL) content for medication knowledge management.评估HL7/FDA结构化产品标签(SPL)内容对药物知识管理的影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;2007:646-50.
8
Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support.生物医学本体的应用:在知识管理、数据集成和决策支持中的作用。
Yearb Med Inform. 2008:67-79.
9
Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.门诊医疗中的电子健康记录——一项针对医生的全国性调查。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):50-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
10
A four-phase model of the evolution of clinical decision support architectures.临床决策支持架构演变的四阶段模型。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Oct;77(10):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

可扩展临床决策支持标准:需求、现行及新兴标准、差距与进展建议。

Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.

作者信息

Kawamoto Kensaku, Del Fiol Guilherme, Lobach David F, Jenders Robert A

机构信息

Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Box 2914, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:235-44. doi: 10.2174/1874431101004010235. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

DOI:10.2174/1874431101004010235
PMID:21603283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3097480/
Abstract

Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS.

摘要

尽管先进的临床决策支持(CDS)功能有显著改善医疗保健的潜力,但在临床环境中却未得到广泛应用。CDS功能应用有限的一个重要原因是,当前大多数CDS实施都具有特定应用和特定机构的性质。因此,要在更大规模上实现CDS功能,迫切需要开发和采用相关标准,以使现有和新兴的CDS资源能够在多个应用和护理环境中得到更有效的利用。实现CDS有效扩展所需的标准包括:(i)用于表示和交流医疗数据的标准术语和信息模型;(ii)以人类可读和机器可执行格式表示临床知识的标准方法;(iii)利用这些知识资源在各种应用和护理环境中提供CDS功能的标准方法。为满足这些需求,已经存在或正在制定一些标准。然而,仍然存在许多差距和挑战,包括许多标准过于复杂;采用标准方法实现的易于获取的知识资源有限;以及缺乏工具和其他实用资源以促进对现有标准的有效采用。因此,当前CDS标准的未来发展和广泛采用将严重依赖于工具、知识库和其他资源的可用性,这些资源使得采用CDS标准不仅是正确的做法,而且与使用传统的临时方法实施CDS相比,是一条具有成本效益的途径。