University of Cape Town Department of Psychiatry, Groote Schuur Hospital J-2, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011 Aug;13(4):248-50. doi: 10.1007/s11920-011-0207-1.
The question of how to optimally organize into chapters and label the different categories of mental disorders is an important one for DSM-5 and ICD-11. The grouping of mental disorders, or meta-structure, should arguably reflect knowledge on the validity of different conditions and their relationships, and should ideally contribute to improving the clinical utility of the nosology by guiding clinical assessment and management. The DSM-5 Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum, Posttraumatic, and Dissociative Disorders Workgroup has reviewed the nature of anxiety disorders, the possibility of including a new category of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders in the DSM-5, and the concept of traumatic stress disorders. It is difficult to devise a perfect nosology that dissects nature at her joints; instead, any particular approach to the meta-structure would seem to have pros and cons that must be carefully weighed. Despite the imperfections of any meta-structure, we are hopeful that each revision of the nosology will bring with it greater diagnostic validity and clinical utility.
如何最优地组织章节并对不同类别的精神障碍进行分类,这是 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 面临的一个重要问题。精神障碍的分组,或称为元结构,应该反映出对不同病症的有效性及其关系的认识,并且应该通过指导临床评估和管理,为提高分类学的临床实用性做出贡献。DSM-5 焦虑、强迫症谱、创伤后和分离性障碍工作组审查了焦虑障碍的性质、在 DSM-5 中纳入新的强迫症谱障碍类别以及创伤应激障碍的概念。设计一种能够剖析自然关节的完美分类学是困难的;相反,任何特定的元结构方法似乎都有利有弊,必须仔细权衡。尽管任何元结构都不完美,但我们希望分类学的每次修订都会带来更高的诊断有效性和临床实用性。