Suppr超能文献

区分成年人的迟钝认知节奏与注意力缺陷/多动障碍。

Distinguishing sluggish cognitive tempo from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, 1752 Greenspoint Court, Mt. Pleasant, SC 29466, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Nov;121(4):978-90. doi: 10.1037/a0023961. Epub 2011 May 23.

Abstract

Researchers who study subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children have identified a subset having a sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) typified by symptoms of daydreaming, mental confusion, sluggish-lethargic behavior, and hypoactivity, among others who differ in many respects from ADHD. No studies have examined the nature and correlates of SCT in adults. This study sought to do so using a general population sample in which those having high levels of SCT symptoms were identified (≥95th percentile) and compared to adults having high levels of ADHD symptoms and adults having both SCT and ADHD symptoms. From a representative sample of 1,249 U.S. adults 18-96 years four groups were created: (a) high levels of SCT but not ADHD (N = 33), (b) high levels of ADHD but not SCT (N = 46), (c) high levels of both SCT and ADHD (N = 39), and (d) the remaining adults as a control group (N = 1,131). As in children, SCT formed a distinct dimension from ADHD symptoms that was unrelated to age, sex, or ethnicity. Adults in both ADHD groups were younger than those with SCT only or control adults. The SCT-only group had less education than the control group, whereas both SCT groups earned less annual income than the control or ADHD-only group. More individuals in the combined group were out of work on disability. In their EF, both SCT groups reported greater difficulties with self-organization and problem solving than controls or the ADHD-only group. Otherwise, the SCT + ADHD group reported significantly greater problems with all other domains of EF than the other groups. But both the SCT-only and ADHD-only groups had significantly more EF difficulties than controls though not differing from each other. A similar pattern was evident on most ratings of psychosocial impairment, except in work and education where SCT was more impairing than ADHD alone and in driving where ADHD was more impairing. SCT contributed unique variance to EF deficits and psychosocial impairment apart from ADHD inattention and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. Results further suggested that a symptom threshold of 5 or more out of 9 along with a requirement of impairment would result in 5.1% of the population as having SCT. It is concluded that SCT may be a separate disorder from ADHD yet with comorbidity occurring in approximately half of all cases of each.

摘要

研究人员对儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)亚型进行了研究,发现了一组以白日梦、精神混乱、反应迟钝、行为懒散和多动等症状为特征的认知节奏缓慢(SCT)亚组,这些症状与 ADHD 有许多不同之处。目前还没有研究探讨成年人 SCT 的性质和相关性。本研究使用一般人群样本进行了研究,在该样本中确定了具有高水平 SCT 症状的人群(≥第 95 个百分位数),并将其与具有高水平 ADHD 症状的成年人和同时具有 SCT 和 ADHD 症状的成年人进行了比较。在来自美国 18-96 岁的 1249 名成年人的代表性样本中,创建了以下四个组:(a)高水平 SCT 但无 ADHD(N=33),(b)高水平 ADHD 但无 SCT(N=46),(c)同时具有高水平 SCT 和 ADHD(N=39),和(d)其余成年人作为对照组(N=1131)。与儿童一样,SCT 与 ADHD 症状形成了一个不同的维度,与年龄、性别或种族无关。ADHD 两组的成年人都比只有 SCT 或对照组的成年人年轻。只有 SCT 的组受教育程度低于对照组,而两个 SCT 组的年收入均低于对照组或仅 ADHD 组。合并组中更多的人因残疾而失业。在执行功能方面,SCT 组和 ADHD 组均报告自我组织和解决问题的难度较大,而对照组或仅 ADHD 组则报告难度较小。否则,SCT+ADHD 组在 EF 的所有其他领域的问题都明显多于其他组。但是,只有 SCT 和仅 ADHD 组的 EF 困难都明显多于对照组,尽管彼此之间没有差异。在大多数社会心理障碍的评估中,都出现了类似的模式,除了在工作和教育方面,SCT 比单独的 ADHD 更具障碍性,而在驾驶方面,ADHD 比单独的 ADHD 更具障碍性。SCT 对 EF 缺陷和社会心理障碍的贡献除了 ADHD 注意力不集中和多动冲动症状外,还具有独特的变异性。结果进一步表明,9 项症状中有 5 项或以上,同时存在功能损害,将导致人群中有 5.1%的人患有 SCT。结论是,SCT 可能是一种与 ADHD 不同的疾病,但大约有一半的病例同时伴有共病。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验