Department of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Nov;120(4):832-43. doi: 10.1037/a0023939. Epub 2011 May 23.
Although considerable evidence shows that affective symptoms and personality traits demonstrate moderate to high relative stabilities during adolescence and early adulthood, there has been little work done to examine differential stability among these constructs or to study the manner in which the stability of these constructs is expressed. The present study used a three-year longitudinal design in an adolescent/young adult sample to examine the stability of depression symptoms, social phobia symptoms, specific phobia symptoms, neuroticism, and extraversion. When considering one-, two-, and three-year durations, anxiety and personality stabilities were generally similar and typically greater than the stability of depression. Comparison of various representations of a latent variable trait-state-occasion (TSO) model revealed that whereas the full TSO model was the best representation for depression, a trait stability model was the most parsimonious of the best-fitting models for the anxiety and personality constructs. Over three years, the percentages of variance explained by the trait component for the anxiety and personality constructs (73-84%) were significantly greater than that explained by the trait component for depression (46%). These findings indicate that symptoms of depression are more episodic in nature, whereas symptoms of anxiety are more similar to personality variables in their expression of stability.
尽管有相当多的证据表明,情感症状和人格特质在青少年和成年早期表现出中等至高度的相对稳定性,但很少有人研究这些结构之间的差异稳定性,也很少有人研究这些结构的稳定性是如何表现的。本研究在青少年/年轻成人样本中使用了三年的纵向设计,以检验抑郁症状、社交恐惧症症状、特定恐惧症症状、神经质和外向性的稳定性。当考虑一年、两年和三年的持续时间时,焦虑和人格稳定性通常相似,通常大于抑郁的稳定性。对潜在变量特质-状态-场合(TSO)模型的各种表示形式的比较表明,虽然完整的 TSO 模型是抑郁的最佳表示形式,但特质稳定性模型是焦虑和人格结构中拟合最好的模型中最简约的模型。在三年的时间里,焦虑和人格结构中特质成分解释的方差百分比(73%-84%)明显大于抑郁特质成分解释的方差百分比(46%)。这些发现表明,抑郁症状的性质更具间歇性,而焦虑症状在稳定性的表达上更类似于人格变量。