• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鉴别一般人格障碍和特定人格障碍特征及其对物质依赖共病的影响。

Distinguishing general and specific personality disorder features and implications for substance dependence comorbidity.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug;120(3):656-69. doi: 10.1037/a0023539.

DOI:10.1037/a0023539
PMID:21604829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241053/
Abstract

Clinical and population-based samples show high comorbidity between Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) and Axis II Personality Disorders (PDs). However, Axis II disorders are frequently comorbid with each other, and existing research has generally failed to distinguish the extent to which SUD/PD comorbidity is general or specific with respect to both specific types of PDs and specific types of SUDs. We sought to determine whether ostensibly specific comorbid substance dependence-Axis II diagnoses (e.g., alcohol use dependence and borderline personality disorder) are reflective of more pervasive or general personality pathology or whether the comorbidity is specific to individual PDs. Face-to-face interview data from Wave 1 and Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions were analyzed. Participants included 34,653 adults living in households in the United States. We used hierarchical factor models to statistically partition general and specific personality disorder dimensions while simultaneously testing for specific PD-substance dependence relations. Results indicated that substance dependence-Axis II comorbidity is characterized by general (pervasive) pathology and by Cluster B PD pathology over and above the relationship to the general PD factor. Further, these relations between PD factors and substance dependence diagnoses appeared to largely account for the comorbidity among substance dependence diagnoses in the younger but not older participants. Our findings suggest that a failure to consider the general PD factor, which we interpret as reflecting interpersonal dysfunction, can lead to potential mischaracterizations of the nature of certain PD and SUD comorbidities.

摘要

临床和基于人群的样本表明,物质使用障碍(SUDs)和轴 II 人格障碍(PDs)之间存在高度共病。然而,轴 II 障碍经常相互共病,并且现有研究通常未能区分 SUD/PD 共病在特定类型的 PD 和特定类型的 SUD 方面是普遍的还是特定的。我们试图确定表面上特定的物质依赖-轴 II 诊断(例如,酒精使用依赖和边缘型人格障碍)是否反映了更普遍或一般的人格病理学,或者共病是否特定于个体 PD。对来自美国家庭的 34653 名成年人的全国酒精和相关条件流行病学调查的第 1 波和第 2 波进行了面对面访谈数据的分析。我们使用层次因子模型来统计分离一般和特定的人格障碍维度,同时测试特定 PD-物质依赖关系。结果表明,物质依赖-轴 II 共病的特征是普遍(普遍)的病理和 B 群 PD 病理,而不仅仅是与一般 PD 因素的关系。此外,这些 PD 因素与物质依赖诊断之间的关系似乎在很大程度上解释了年轻参与者而不是年长参与者中物质依赖诊断之间的共病。我们的研究结果表明,如果不考虑一般 PD 因素,即我们认为反映人际功能障碍的因素,可能会导致对某些 PD 和 SUD 共病性质的潜在错误描述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/4241053/012ade402132/nihms304873f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/4241053/01d672093ebb/nihms304873f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/4241053/012ade402132/nihms304873f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/4241053/01d672093ebb/nihms304873f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/4241053/012ade402132/nihms304873f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinguishing general and specific personality disorder features and implications for substance dependence comorbidity.鉴别一般人格障碍和特定人格障碍特征及其对物质依赖共病的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug;120(3):656-69. doi: 10.1037/a0023539.
2
Substance use disorders among personality disordered patients admitted for day hospital treatment. Implications for service developments.日间医院治疗收治的人格障碍患者中的物质使用障碍。对服务发展的启示。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(1):57-63. doi: 10.1080/08039480802298705.
3
A comparison between dually diagnosed inpatients with and without Axis II comorbidity and the relationship to treatment outcome.伴有与不伴有轴II共病的双重诊断住院患者之间的比较及其与治疗结果的关系。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003 May;29(2):263-79. doi: 10.1081/ada-120020511.
4
The Co-occurrence of Personality Disorders and Substance Use Disorders.人格障碍与物质使用障碍共病。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):545-554. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01452-6. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
5
Coexistence between personality disorders and substance use disorder. Madrid study about prevalence of dual pathology.人格障碍与物质使用障碍的共存。马德里关于双重病理患病率的研究。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2019 Nov;47(6):218-28. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
6
Personality disorders in substance abusers: relation to substance use.物质滥用者的人格障碍:与物质使用的关系。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998 Feb;186(2):87-95. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199802000-00004.
7
Personality disorders and the 3-year course of alcohol, drug, and nicotine use disorders.人格障碍与酒精、药物和尼古丁使用障碍的3年病程
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;68(11):1158-67. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.136.
8
Co-occurrence of 12-month alcohol and drug use disorders and personality disorders in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.美国12个月酒精与药物使用障碍和人格障碍的共病情况:酒精及相关状况全国流行病学调查结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;61(4):361-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.361.
9
Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders.修订后的 NESARC 人格障碍诊断:性别、患病率以及与物质依赖障碍的共病。
J Pers Disord. 2010 Aug;24(4):412-26. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.412.
10
Bipolar obsessive-compulsive disorder and personality disorders.双相情感障碍伴强迫障碍及人格障碍。
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Nov;9(7):722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00508.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of individuals screening positive for borderline personality disorder on an adult inpatient psychiatry unit: a cross-sectional study.成人住院精神科病房中边缘型人格障碍筛查呈阳性个体的特征与结局:一项横断面研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 5;25(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06928-8.
2
Analysis of the Relationship between Higher-Order Factor Structure of Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality.人格障碍的高阶因素结构与人格五因素模型之间的关系分析
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):605. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040605.
3
Self-reported narcissistic traits in patients with addiction through the lens of the ICD-11 model for personality disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
The Multiple, Distinct Ways that Personality Contributes to Alcohol Use Disorders.人格导致酒精使用障碍的多种不同方式。
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010 Sep;4(9):767-782. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00296.x.
2
It's the algorithm! Why differential rates of chronicity and comorbidity are not evidence for the validity of the abuse-dependence distinction.正是算法!为什么慢性和共病的差异率不是滥用依赖区分的有效性的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Nov;119(4):650-61. doi: 10.1037/a0020116.
3
Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders.
从国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍模型的角度看成瘾患者自我报告的自恋特质。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 25;13:1041480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1041480. eCollection 2022.
4
A bifactor model of personality organization in adolescence: the validity of a brief screening measure assessing severity and core domains of functioning.青少年人格组织的双因素模型:一种评估严重程度和核心功能领域的简短筛查测量的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03926-y.
5
Personality Pathology and Substance Misuse in Later Life: Perspectives from Interviewer-, Self-, and Informant-Reports.晚年的人格病理学与物质滥用:来自访谈者、自我及知情者报告的视角
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2021 Sep;43(3):597-619. doi: 10.1007/s10862-020-09862-z. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
Schema modes and their associations with emotion regulation, mindfulness, and self-compassion among patients with personality disorders.人格障碍患者的图式模式及其与情绪调节、正念和自我同情的关联。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Jun 10;8(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00160-y.
7
Understanding the Relationship Between Complicated Grief Symptoms and Patterns of Personality Disorders in a Substance Users' Sample: A Network Analysis Approach.了解物质使用者样本中复杂悲伤症状与人格障碍模式之间的关系:一种网络分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 30;11:566785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566785. eCollection 2020.
8
Exploring substance use disorders and relapse in Mauritian male addicts.探索毛里求斯男性成瘾者的物质使用障碍及复发情况。
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 18;6(8):e04731. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04731. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations.双因素分析在精神病理学研究中的恰当运用:认识其优势与局限。
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;88(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Co-Morbidity of Personality Disorder in Major Depressive Disorder Among Psychiatric Outpatients in China: A Further Analysis of an Epidemiologic Survey in a Clinical Population.中国精神科门诊重性抑郁障碍患者中人格障碍的共病情况:临床人群流行病学调查的进一步分析
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 12;10:833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00833. eCollection 2019.
修订后的 NESARC 人格障碍诊断:性别、患病率以及与物质依赖障碍的共病。
J Pers Disord. 2010 Aug;24(4):412-26. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.412.
4
Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to alcohol use disorders.理解冲动性的结构及其与酒精使用障碍的关系。
Addict Biol. 2010 Apr;15(2):217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00190.x.
5
A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for assessment and treatment.基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版焦虑症和情绪障碍共同特征的维度分类系统提案:对评估和治疗的启示
Psychol Assess. 2009 Sep;21(3):256-71. doi: 10.1037/a0016608.
6
An integrative dimensional classification of personality disorder.人格障碍的综合维度分类
Psychol Assess. 2009 Sep;21(3):243-55. doi: 10.1037/a0016606.
7
Is "maturing out" of problematic alcohol involvement related to personality change?从酒精问题中“自然好转”是否与人格改变有关?
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 May;118(2):360-74. doi: 10.1037/a0015125.
8
The age distribution of self-reported personality disorder traits in a household population.家庭人群中自我报告的人格障碍特质的年龄分布。
J Pers Disord. 2009 Apr;23(2):187-200. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.2.187.
9
Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency.基于情绪的鲁莽行动倾向:积极紧迫性和消极紧迫性。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;134(6):807-28. doi: 10.1037/a0013341.
10
The frequency of personality disorders in psychiatric patients.精神科患者中人格障碍的发生率。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;31(3):405-20, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2008.03.015.