IFR 145 GEIST, Institut d'Epidémiologie Neurologique et de Neurologie Tropicale, EA 3174 Neuroepidémiologie Tropicale et Comparée, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(3):194-203. doi: 10.1159/000327496. Epub 2011 May 24.
The best approach to determine the burden of neurological disorders in developing countries is to perform population-based studies. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of neurological disorders in a Mexican rural community and assess the usefulness of a household screening questionnaire.
The survey took place in a Mexican rural community of Puebla State in Mexico. This was a cross-sectional, population-based, 2-phase study including a comparison of the usefulness levels of the individual (IQ) and household (HQ) questionnaires.
A total of 4,008 individuals participated in the prevalence study using the IQ; of these, 280 neurological examinations allowed to identify 127 individuals suffering from at least 1 neurological disease. The most frequent ailments were headache (22.4/1,000, 95% confidence interval, CI: 17.7-28.2), neuropathy (7.1/1,000, CI 95%: 4.4-11.3) and epilepsy (3.9/1,000, CI 95%: 2.3-6.5). The HQ, used in parallel with the IQ, detected significantly fewer neurological cases. This result was mainly due to the low capacity of the HQ to detect headache.
Results of the prevalence study are discussed emphasizing their relevance in adequately allocating resources. The usefulness of the HQ for screening neurological disorders in general was low, but could be adequate for specific neurological disorders.
确定发展中国家神经障碍负担的最佳方法是开展基于人群的研究。我们的目的是确定墨西哥农村社区神经障碍的患病率,并评估家庭筛查问卷的实用性。
该调查在墨西哥普埃布拉州的一个墨西哥农村社区进行。这是一项横断面、基于人群的两阶段研究,包括比较个体(智商)和家庭(家庭问卷)问卷的实用性水平。
共有 4008 人使用智商参加了患病率研究;其中,280 次神经系统检查确定了 127 名至少患有 1 种神经疾病的患者。最常见的疾病是头痛(22.4/1000,95%置信区间,CI:17.7-28.2)、神经病(7.1/1000,CI 95%:4.4-11.3)和癫痫(3.9/1000,CI 95%:2.3-6.5)。同时使用的家庭问卷检测到的神经病例明显较少。这一结果主要是由于家庭问卷检测头痛的能力较低。
讨论了患病率研究的结果,强调了它们在合理分配资源方面的重要性。家庭问卷对一般神经障碍的筛查作用较低,但对特定神经障碍可能是足够的。