• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病研究中知情同意的伦理问题。

The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research.

机构信息

Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls 7C27, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

出版信息

Nat Rev Neurol. 2011 May 24;7(7):410-4. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.76.

DOI:10.1038/nrneurol.2011.76
PMID:21610690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3475518/
Abstract

Clinical research on Alzheimer disease (AD) is much needed but requires the participation of patients with substantial cognitive impairment who have difficulty providing informed consent. Despite decades of debate, policies regulating such research are not well-defined. Although numerous studies have underscored the difficulties of obtaining informed consent for clinical research from patients compromised by AD, there is also increasing evidence that such individuals and their surrogates can make decisions about research participation that are consistent with the patients' values. Policy discussions and future research should consider how the ethical reservations about enrolling incapacitated patients in research could be mitigated by developing ways to promote the congruence between surrogates' decisions and patients' values.

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)的临床研究非常必要,但需要有认知障碍的患者参与,而这些患者难以提供知情同意。尽管已经进行了几十年的辩论,但规范此类研究的政策仍未明确界定。尽管许多研究强调了从受 AD 影响的患者那里获得临床研究知情同意的困难,但越来越多的证据表明,这些患者及其代理人可以做出符合患者价值观的研究参与决策。政策讨论和未来的研究应该考虑如何通过开发促进代理人决策与患者价值观一致性的方法来减轻在研究中招募无行为能力患者的道德保留意见。

相似文献

1
The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research.阿尔茨海默病研究中知情同意的伦理问题。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2011 May 24;7(7):410-4. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.76.
2
Ethical approval in studies raising consent issues.涉及同意问题的研究中的伦理批准。
Nurs Times. 2015;111(3):18-20.
3
Individualism and the ethics of research on humans.个人主义与人类研究伦理
HEC Forum. 2004 Mar;16(1):6-26. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000031776.37723.98.
4
Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study.知情同意评估:一项试点研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jul;59(2):146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04279.x. Epub 2007 Jun 3.
5
Letter from the Editor.编辑来信。
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Sep;44(3):365. doi: 10.1177/1073110516667934.
6
The ethics of clinical research in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家的临床研究伦理
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;118:301-13. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00025-1.
7
Ethical considerations in research studies.研究中的伦理考量。
Medsurg Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;23(1):54-5.
8
Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans.痴呆症研究的替代同意:对美国老年人的全国性调查。
Neurology. 2009 Jan 13;72(2):149-55. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000339039.18931.a2.
9
Re-visiting consent for clinical research on acute myocardial infarction and other emergent conditions.重新审视急性心肌梗死和其他紧急情况的临床研究中的同意问题。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.001.
10
Henry Beecher and Consent to Research: a critical re-examination.亨利·比彻与研究同意书:一次批判性的重新审视
Perspect Biol Med. 2016;59(1):78-94. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2016.0015.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging Health Disparity Gaps in Alzheimer's Disease among Marginalized Populations: Clinical Proteomics as a Case Study.弥合边缘化人群中阿尔茨海默病的健康差距:以临床蛋白质组学为例
ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2025 Jul 8;5(4):505-518. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.5c00074. eCollection 2025 Aug 20.
2
Targeting Aging Hallmarks with Monoclonal Antibodies: A New Era in Cancer Immunotherapy and Geriatric Medicine.用单克隆抗体靶向衰老特征:癌症免疫疗法和老年医学的新时代。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 22;26(11):4982. doi: 10.3390/ijms26114982.
3
Assessing the Content of Goals of Care Documentation for Hospitalized Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.评估阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症住院患者护理目标文件的内容
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19502.
4
Ethical issues in genomics research in persons with Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD): a systematic review.阿尔茨海默病/阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)患者中基因组学研究的伦理问题:系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01141-w.
5
Considerations for legal, ethical, and effective practice in dementia research.痴呆症研究中合法、合乎伦理及有效实践的考量因素。
Brain Commun. 2024 Jun 14;6(4):fcae211. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae211. eCollection 2024.
6
Authenticity and brain health: a values-based perspective and cultural education approach.真实性与大脑健康:基于价值观的视角与文化教育方法
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1206142. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1206142. eCollection 2023.
7
Research Attitude and Interest among Cancer Survivors with or without Cognitive Impairment.有或无认知障碍的癌症幸存者的研究态度和兴趣
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;15(13):3409. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133409.
8
Expanding the ethnographic toolkit: Using medical documents to include kinless older adults living with dementia in qualitative research.拓展民族志工具包:在定性研究中使用医疗文件将无亲属的老年痴呆症患者纳入其中。
J Aging Stud. 2023 Jun;65:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101140. Epub 2023 May 10.
9
Barriers to Using Legally Authorized Representatives in Clinical Research with Older Adults.在针对老年人的临床研究中使用法定授权代表的障碍。
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023 Feb 14;7(1):135-149. doi: 10.3233/ADR-220103. eCollection 2023.
10
Willingness to Participate in Clinical Research Among Individuals With Cognitive Impairment.认知障碍个体参与临床研究的意愿。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):76-84. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20220131-01. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research.公众讨论对痴呆症研究中代理同意态度的影响。
Neurology. 2011 Dec 13;77(24):2097-104. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823648cb. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
Variability of judgments of capacity: experience of capacity evaluators in a study of research consent capacity.判断能力的变异性:研究研究同意能力中的能力评估者的经验。
Psychosomatics. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Research with decisionally incapacitated older adults: practices of Canadian research ethics boards.对无决策能力的老年人进行的研究:加拿大研究伦理委员会的做法
IRB. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):1-8.
4
Preservation of the capacity to appoint a proxy decision maker: implications for dementia research.保留指定代理人决策者的能力:对痴呆症研究的影响
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;68(2):214-20. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.191.
5
Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making.替代利益与最佳判断:代理决策的综合模型
JAMA. 2010 Nov 3;304(17):1946-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1595.
6
Surrogate consent for research involving adults with impaired decision making: survey of Institutional Review Board practices.代理同意在涉及决策障碍成年人的研究中的应用:机构审查委员会实践调查。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2146-54. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f26fe6.
7
Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research.在痴呆症研究中对代理同意进行审议性评估。
Alzheimers Dement. 2010 Jul;6(4):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.06.001. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
8
Seeking assent and respecting dissent in dementia research.在痴呆症研究中寻求同意并尊重不同意见。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;18(1):77-85. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181bd1de2.
9
Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.评估公众在研究伦理争议中的观点:协商民主与生物伦理学是天然盟友。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Dec;4(4):3-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.3.
10
Choosing for another: beyond autonomy and best interests.为他人做选择:超越自主性与最佳利益
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Mar-Apr;39(2):31-7. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0113.