Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病/阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)患者中基因组学研究的伦理问题:系统评价。

Ethical issues in genomics research in persons with Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD): a systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Bioethics and Research, 102 Basorun Rd, Akobo, Ibadan, Oyo State, 200285, Nigeria.

Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Multi-Disciplinary Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01141-w.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given the growing number of Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) genomics research projects and the vulnerabilities of study participants, it is critical to evaluate the literature on the ethical challenges in such studies to ensure high ethical standards.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on ethical issues in AD/ADRD genomics research. We searched Embase, PsycINFO, CiNAHL, Scopus, and Ovid Medline for empirical and normative papers published in peer-reviewed journals on the ethical issues involved in conducting genomics research among persons with AD/ADRD. We used ethical principles from an existing framework as a priori codes to categorize the ethical issues and adapted another framework of Dementia Research Ethical Issues (DREI) as subcategories for our synthesis. We used the 2021 PRISMA guidelines to guide our study.

RESULTS

We screened 5,509 papers and included 27 of these papers in the systematic review after deduplication, title, and full-text review. The papers contained 109 ethical issues that were mapped against 42 out of 75 relevant DREIs. The highest number of DREIs were mapped to "respect for persons and communities", "favorable risk-benefit ratio", "informed consent" and "scientific validity". The least mapped principles to the DREIs were "fair participant selection", "independent review", "social value", and "collaborative partnership".

CONCLUSION

Our review showed that there is a dearth of literature on the ethical principles of "fair participant selection", "independent review", "social value" and "collaborative partnership" in genomics research on AD/ADRDs. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from the distribution of attention paid to specific principles because these may only reflect the concerns of AD/ADRD genomics research ethicists in high-income countries. There is need for more research on the ethics of AD/ADRD genomics research in low and middle-income countries for a more balanced account of the important ethical considerations in this field.

摘要

简介

鉴于阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症(AD/ADRD)基因组学研究项目的数量不断增加,以及研究参与者的脆弱性,评估此类研究中伦理挑战的文献至关重要,以确保高标准的伦理准则。

方法

我们对 AD/ADRD 基因组学研究中伦理问题的文献进行了系统回顾。我们在 Embase、PsycINFO、CiNAHL、Scopus 和 Ovid Medline 中搜索了发表在同行评议期刊上的关于在 AD/ADRD 人群中进行基因组学研究所涉及的伦理问题的实证和规范论文。我们使用现有框架中的伦理原则作为先验代码对伦理问题进行分类,并将另一个痴呆症研究伦理问题框架(DREI)作为我们综合分析的子类别。我们使用 2021 年 PRISMA 指南来指导我们的研究。

结果

我们筛选了 5509 篇论文,经过去重、标题和全文审查,有 27 篇论文纳入系统综述。这些论文包含了 109 个伦理问题,这些问题与 DREI 中 75 个相关的 DREI 中的 42 个进行了映射。映射到“尊重个人和社区”、“有利的风险-效益比”、“知情同意”和“科学有效性”的 DREI 数量最多。映射到 DREI 的最少原则是“公平选择参与者”、“独立审查”、“社会价值”和“合作伙伴关系”。

结论

我们的综述表明,AD/ADRD 基因组学研究中关于“公平选择参与者”、“独立审查”、“社会价值”和“合作伙伴关系”等伦理原则的文献很少。由于这些原则可能仅反映了高收入国家 AD/ADRD 基因组学研究伦理学家的关注,因此很难从对特定原则的关注分布中得出确凿的结论。需要在中低收入国家进行更多关于 AD/ADRD 基因组学研究伦理的研究,以便更全面地了解该领域的重要伦理考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd72/11587778/4ec52c063c77/12910_2024_1141_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验