• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传染病与安全化:世卫组织的困境。

Infectious diseases and securitization: WHO's dilemma.

作者信息

Jin Jiyong, Karackattu Joe Thomas

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Jun;9(2):181-7. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0045.

DOI:10.1089/bsp.2010.0045
PMID:21612367
Abstract

The threat posed by infectious diseases has been increasingly framed as a security issue. The UN Security Council's Resolution 1308, which designated HIV/AIDS as a threat to international security, evidenced the securitization process. Using securitization theory as a theoretical tool, this article explores the securitization of infectious diseases in the World Health Organization (WHO). While WHO has tended to securitize infectious diseases since 2000, it has encountered a dilemma in the process because of the inherent asymmetry of interest between developed and developing countries. The act of securitization in WHO currently remains mostly a rhetorical device, since WHO's norms emblematic of securitization have not been backed by operational measures for verification or enforcement due to these asymmetric interests.

摘要

传染病构成的威胁越来越多地被界定为一个安全问题。联合国安理会第1308号决议将艾滋病毒/艾滋病指定为对国际安全的威胁,这证明了安全化进程。本文以安全化理论为理论工具,探讨世界卫生组织(WHO)中传染病的安全化问题。自2000年以来,世卫组织倾向于将传染病安全化,但由于发达国家和发展中国家之间固有的利益不对称,它在这一过程中遇到了困境。世卫组织目前的安全化行为大多仍只是一种修辞手段,因为由于这些不对称利益,世卫组织象征安全化的规范并未得到核查或执行的行动措施的支持。

相似文献

1
Infectious diseases and securitization: WHO's dilemma.传染病与安全化:世卫组织的困境。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Jun;9(2):181-7. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0045.
2
Caught between paradise and power: public health, pathogenic threats, and the axis of illness.困于天堂与权力之间:公共卫生、致病威胁与疾病轴心
McGeorge Law Rev. 2004;35(1):45-104.
3
Infectious diseases, security and ethics: the case of HIV/AIDS.传染病、安全与伦理:以艾滋病毒/艾滋病为例
Bioethics. 2008 Nov;22(9):457-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00696.x.
4
Neglected Dimensions of Global Security: The Global Health Risk Framework Commission.全球安全被忽视的层面:全球卫生风险框架委员会
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1451-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1964.
5
HIV/AIDS Securitization: Outcomes and Current Challenges.艾滋病毒/艾滋病的安全化:成果与当前挑战
Curr HIV Res. 2017;15(2):78-81. doi: 10.2174/1570162X15666170516163834.
6
How is health a security issue? Politics, responses and issues.健康如何成为安全问题?政治、应对措施和问题。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Nov;25(6):447-53. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq063.
7
Dilemmas of securitization and health risk management in the People's Republic of China: the cases of SARS and avian influenza.中国在证券化和健康风险管理方面的困境:SARS 和禽流感案例。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Nov;25(6):454-66. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq065.
8
AIDS and international security in the United Nations System.艾滋病与联合国系统中的国际安全。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Nov;25(6):495-504. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq051.
9
WHO's in charge?谁负责?
Nature. 2006 Jul 20;442(7100):223. doi: 10.1038/442223a.
10
Global health security agenda and the international health regulations: moving forward.全球卫生安全议程与《国际卫生条例》:向前迈进
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Sep-Oct;12(5):231-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2014.0038.

引用本文的文献

1
HIV/AIDS, SARS, and COVID-19: the trajectory of China's pandemic responses and its changing politics in a contested world.艾滋病毒/艾滋病、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和 COVID-19:中国应对大流行的轨迹及其在充满争议的世界中不断变化的政治。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-01011-x.