London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, London, UK.
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Aug;16(8):936-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02793.x. Epub 2011 May 30.
To evaluate the existing WHO dengue classification across all age groups and a wide geographical range and to develop a revised evidence-based classification that would better reflect clinical severity.
We followed suspected dengue cases daily in seven countries across South-east Asia and Latin America and then categorised them into one of three intervention groups describing disease severity according to the overall level of medical and nursing support required. Using a pre-defined analysis plan, we explored the clinical and laboratory profiles characteristic of these intervention categories and presented the most promising options for a revised classification scheme to an independent group of WHO dengue experts for consideration. Potential warning signs were also evaluated by comparing contemporaneous data of patients who progressed to severe disease with the data of those who did not.
A total of 2259 patients were recruited during 2006-2007 and 230 (13%) of the 1734 laboratory-confirmed patients required major intervention. Applying the existing WHO system, 47/210 (22%) of patients with shock did not fulfil all the criteria for dengue haemorrhagic fever. However, no three-tier revision adequately described the different severity groups either. Inclusion of readily discernible complications (shock/severe vascular leakage and/or severe bleeding and/or severe organ dysfunction) was necessary to devise a system that identified patients requiring major intervention with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be practically useful. Only a small number of subjects (5%) progressed to severe disease while under observation; several warning signs were identified, but much larger studies are necessary to fully characterize features associated with disease progression.
Based on these results, a revised classification system comprised of two entities, 'Dengue' and 'Severe Dengue', was proposed and has now been incorporated into the new WHO guidelines.
评估所有年龄组和广泛地理范围内现有的世界卫生组织登革热分类,并制定一个新的基于证据的分类,更好地反映临床严重程度。
我们在东南亚和拉丁美洲的七个国家对疑似登革热病例进行了日常监测,并根据所需医疗和护理支持的总体水平将其分为三组干预组之一,对疾病严重程度进行分类。使用预先定义的分析计划,我们探索了这些干预组的临床和实验室特征,并向一组独立的世界卫生组织登革热专家展示了最有前途的修订分类方案选项供其考虑。还通过比较进展为严重疾病的患者和未进展为严重疾病的患者的同期数据,评估了潜在的预警信号。
在 2006-2007 年期间共招募了 2259 名患者,其中 230 名(13%)经实验室确诊的患者需要进行重大干预。根据现有的世界卫生组织系统,47/210(22%)名休克患者不符合所有登革热出血热的标准。然而,没有任何三级修订版能够充分描述不同的严重程度组。需要纳入易于识别的并发症(休克/严重血管渗漏和/或严重出血和/或严重器官功能障碍),以制定一个能够足够敏感和特异识别需要重大干预的患者的系统,使其具有实际应用价值。只有少数患者(5%)在观察期间进展为严重疾病;确定了一些预警信号,但需要进行更大规模的研究以充分描述与疾病进展相关的特征。
基于这些结果,提出了一个新的修订分类系统,由两个实体组成,“登革热”和“重症登革热”,现已纳入世界卫生组织新指南。