Suppr超能文献

家庭医生在痴呆不同阶段的痴呆诊断准确性:系统评价。

The accuracy of family physicians' dementia diagnoses at different stages of dementia: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;27(4):342-54. doi: 10.1002/gps.2726. Epub 2011 May 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Optimising care for dementia patients and their informal carers is imperative in light of the impending dementia epidemic. An important aspect of care is accurate recognition and diagnosis of dementia. The aim of this review was to estimate family physicians' diagnostic accuracy at the different stages of dementia.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles comparing family physicians' 'dementia' and 'cognitive impairment' diagnoses in the primary care setting to reference standard dementia diagnoses.

RESULTS

Data from six cross-sectional studies of moderate to reasonable methodological quality were extracted for the analysis. One study considered the accuracy of family physicians' recollected diagnoses, and three studies focussed on documented diagnoses. In these four studies, the sensitivity of family physicians' combined diagnostic categories of 'cognitive impairment' together with 'dementia' was 0.48-0.67 for mild dementia and 0.76-0.85 for moderate to severe dementia. The sensitivity of their diagnostic category 'dementia' alone was 0.14-0.33 for mild and 0.28-0.61 for moderate to severe dementia. Specificity was excellent for all severity stages in both comparisons. Three studies examined the accuracy of family physicians' judgement of cognition during consultation. Compared with the studies on recollection and documentation, these studies reported higher sensitivity and lower specificity.

CONCLUSION

Many individuals with dementia are not recognised or not diagnosed as such; particularly mild dementia is under-diagnosed. Collaboration within primary care and education focussing both on knowledge and attitude are recommended to improve the accuracy of family physicians' dementia diagnosis.

摘要

目的

鉴于即将到来的痴呆症流行,优化痴呆症患者及其非专业照护者的护理至关重要。护理的一个重要方面是准确识别和诊断痴呆症。本综述的目的是评估家庭医生在痴呆症不同阶段的诊断准确性。

方法

在 Pubmed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane Library 中搜索比较家庭医生在初级保健环境中对“痴呆症”和“认知障碍”的诊断与参考标准痴呆症诊断的文章。

结果

从中提取了六项具有中等至合理方法学质量的横断面研究的数据进行分析。一项研究考虑了家庭医生回忆诊断的准确性,三项研究侧重于记录的诊断。在这四项研究中,家庭医生对“认知障碍”和“痴呆症”的联合诊断类别的敏感性为 0.48-0.67 用于轻度痴呆症,0.76-0.85 用于中度至重度痴呆症。他们单独诊断类别“痴呆症”的敏感性为 0.14-0.33 用于轻度和 0.28-0.61 用于中度至重度痴呆症。在这两种比较中,所有严重程度的特异性都很好。三项研究检查了家庭医生在咨询期间判断认知的准确性。与回忆和记录的研究相比,这些研究报告了更高的敏感性和更低的特异性。

结论

许多痴呆症患者未被识别或未被诊断为痴呆症;特别是轻度痴呆症的诊断不足。建议在初级保健中进行协作,并开展重点关注知识和态度的教育,以提高家庭医生诊断痴呆症的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验