• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种治疗创伤后应激障碍心理疗法的有效性和效率的对照比较:眼动脱敏再处理疗法与情绪释放疗法

A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques.

作者信息

Karatzias Thanos, Power Kevin, Brown Keith, McGoldrick Theresa, Begum Millia, Young Jenny, Loughran Paul, Chouliara Zoë, Adams Sally

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Life and Social Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Jun;199(6):372-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262.

DOI:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262
PMID:21629014
Abstract

The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.

摘要

本研究首次报告了眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)与情绪自由技术(EFT)治疗创伤后应激障碍的对照比较。共有46名参与者被随机分为EMDR组(n = 23)或EFT组(n = 23)。参与者在基线时接受评估,然后在8周的等待期后重新评估。在治疗后和3个月随访时又进行了两次盲法评估。总体而言,结果表明两种干预措施在相同的疗程数下,于治疗后和随访时均产生了显著的治疗效果。两个治疗组观察到相似的治疗效应大小。关于临床显著变化,与EFT组相比,EMDR组中产生实质性临床变化的患者比例略高。鉴于EFT理论基础的推测性质,对EFT有效成分的拆解研究应留待未来进行。

相似文献

1
A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques.两种治疗创伤后应激障碍心理疗法的有效性和效率的对照比较:眼动脱敏再处理疗法与情绪释放疗法
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Jun;199(6):372-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262.
2
Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, cognitive behavioral writing therapy, and wait-list in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder following single-incident trauma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.比较单次创伤后儿童创伤后应激障碍的眼球运动脱敏再处理疗法、认知行为写作疗法和等待名单:一项多中心随机临床试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;58(11):1219-1228. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12768. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
A controlled study of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disordered sexual assault victims.一项关于眼动脱敏与再加工疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍性侵犯受害者的对照研究。
Bull Menninger Clin. 1997 Summer;61(3):317-34.
4
Efficacy of EMDR in children: a meta-analysis.眼动脱敏再处理疗法对儿童的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Nov;29(7):599-606. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
5
The Effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.情绪释放技术治疗创伤后应激障碍的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Explore (NY). 2017 Jan-Feb;13(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Prolonged exposure vs eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs waiting list for posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with a psychotic disorder: a randomized clinical trial.创伤后应激障碍伴精神病性障碍患者的延长暴露与眼动脱敏再处理治疗与等待治疗的随机临床试验
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;72(3):259-67. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2637.
7
Brief psychological intervention with traumatized young women: the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing.对受创伤年轻女性的简短心理干预:眼动脱敏再处理疗法的疗效
J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jan;11(1):25-44. doi: 10.1023/A:1024400931106.
8
A wait-list controlled pilot study of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for children with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms from motor vehicle accidents.一项针对因机动车事故出现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的儿童的眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)的等待名单对照试点研究。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;15(1):5-25. doi: 10.1177/1359104509339086. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
9
The patient observer: eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing for the treatment of posttraumatic stress following childbirth.患者观察者:眼动脱敏再处理治疗产后创伤后应激。
Birth. 2012 Mar;39(1):70-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00517.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
10
World Trade Center: A longitudinal case study for treating Post Traumatic Stress Disorder with Emotional Freedom Technique and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing.世贸中心:一项关于运用情绪自由技术和眼动脱敏再处理疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的纵向案例研究。
Work. 2019;63(2):199-204. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192921.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Emotional Freedom Techniques in Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a pilot study.情绪释放技术用于创伤后应激障碍患者的可行性:一项初步研究。
J Pharmacopuncture. 2024 Mar 31;27(1):27-37. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2024.27.1.27.
2
Commentary: Emotional freedom techniques for treating post traumatic stress disorder: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.评论:用于治疗创伤后应激障碍的情绪自由技术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 22;15:1308687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308687. eCollection 2024.
3
Emotional freedom techniques for treating post traumatic stress disorder: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
用于治疗创伤后应激障碍的情绪自由技术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1195286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1195286. eCollection 2023.
4
Emotional freedom technique versus written exposure therapy versus waiting list for post-traumatic stress disorder: protocol for a randomised clinical MRI study.情绪自由技术与书面暴露疗法与创伤后应激障碍等候名单的比较:一项随机临床 MRI 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 22;13(6):e070389. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070389.
5
Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions: A systematic review.临床情绪释放技术作为治疗心理和生理疾病的循证实践:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 10;13:951451. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951451. eCollection 2022.
6
Bifocal emotion regulation through acupoint tapping in fear of flying.穴位敲击调节飞行恐惧中的双重情绪。
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:102996. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102996. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Protocol for individual participant data meta-analysis of interventions for post-traumatic stress.创伤后应激干预的个体参与者数据荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e054830. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054830.
8
The Effect of Physiotherapy Group Intervention in Reducing Pain Disorders and Mental Health Symptoms among Syrian Refugees: A Randomized Controlled Trial.物理治疗小组干预对减少叙利亚难民疼痛障碍和精神健康症状的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(24):9468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249468.
9
Virtual Trauma Interventions for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorders: A Scoping Review.用于治疗创伤后应激障碍的虚拟创伤干预措施:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 13;11:562506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562506. eCollection 2020.
10
Emotion regulation through bifocal processing of fear inducing and disgust inducing stimuli.通过对引起恐惧和厌恶的刺激进行双重焦点处理来进行情绪调节。
BMC Neurosci. 2020 Nov 23;21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12868-020-00597-x.