Karatzias Thanos, Power Kevin, Brown Keith, McGoldrick Theresa, Begum Millia, Young Jenny, Loughran Paul, Chouliara Zoë, Adams Sally
Faculty of Health, Life and Social Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Jun;199(6):372-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262.
The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.
本研究首次报告了眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)与情绪自由技术(EFT)治疗创伤后应激障碍的对照比较。共有46名参与者被随机分为EMDR组(n = 23)或EFT组(n = 23)。参与者在基线时接受评估,然后在8周的等待期后重新评估。在治疗后和3个月随访时又进行了两次盲法评估。总体而言,结果表明两种干预措施在相同的疗程数下,于治疗后和随访时均产生了显著的治疗效果。两个治疗组观察到相似的治疗效应大小。关于临床显著变化,与EFT组相比,EMDR组中产生实质性临床变化的患者比例略高。鉴于EFT理论基础的推测性质,对EFT有效成分的拆解研究应留待未来进行。