• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术联合可扩张矫形装置的临床及短期影像学结果。

Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska.

Neurosurgical Associates of New Jersey, West Long Branch, New Jersey.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):E147-E155. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz402.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyz402
PMID:31584070
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. However, its ability to restore lumbar lordosis has been limited. Development of expandable lordotic interbody devices has challenged this limitation, furthering the scope of minimally invasive surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the radiographic and clinical effects of expandable lordotic interbody devices placed through an MIS-TLIF approach.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 32 1-level and 18 2-level MIS-TLIFs performed using lordotic expandable interbody devices. Lumbar radiographic measurements, Oswestry Disability Index scores (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale scores (VAS) were obtained at preoperative, 6 wk follow up, and last follow up time points. Last follow up occurred at a mean of 11.5 ± 7.6 mo (mean ± SD).

RESULTS

At 6-wk follow-up, segmental lordosis, disc height, and foraminal height increased by an average of 3.4°, 6.4 mm, and 4.4 mm, respectively. Only the 2-level group showed a significant increase in lumbar lordosis of 5.8°. No significant changes occurred in sacral slope, pelvic tilt, or pelvic incidence. Average ODI and VAS decreased by -12.0 and -4.5, respectively. Postoperative lumbar lordosis inversely correlated with preoperative lordosis in patients with an initial Pelvic Incidence to Lumbar Lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) of >10°, (r = -0.5, P = .009).

CONCLUSION

When applied across 2-levels, MIS-TLIF using expandable lordotic interbody devices produced a significant increase in lumbar lordosis. Preoperative lumbar lordosis was found to be a predictor of postoperative lumbar lordotic change in patients with sagittal imbalance.

摘要

背景

微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)是治疗退行性腰椎疾病的一种被广泛接受的方法。然而,其恢复腰椎前凸的能力有限。可扩张的腰椎间融合器的发展挑战了这一限制,进一步扩大了微创手术的范围。

目的

评估通过 MIS-TLIF 入路放置可扩张腰椎间融合器的影像学和临床效果。

方法

我们对 32 例 1 节段和 18 例 2 节段的 MIS-TLIF 患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者使用了可扩张的腰椎间融合器。在术前、6 周随访和最后随访时获得腰椎影像学测量、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。最后一次随访的平均时间为 11.5±7.6 个月(均值±标准差)。

结果

在 6 周随访时,节段性前凸角、椎间盘高度和椎间孔高度分别平均增加了 3.4°、6.4mm 和 4.4mm。只有 2 节段组的腰椎前凸增加了 5.8°,有统计学意义。骶骨倾斜角、骨盆倾斜角和骨盆入射角没有显著变化。平均 ODI 和 VAS 分别下降了-12.0 和-4.5。在初始骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸角不匹配(PI-LL)>10°的患者中,术后腰椎前凸角与术前腰椎前凸角呈负相关(r=-0.5,P=0.009)。

结论

在 2 个节段应用时,使用可扩张腰椎间融合器的 MIS-TLIF 可显著增加腰椎前凸角。在矢状面失衡的患者中,术前腰椎前凸角是术后腰椎前凸角变化的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术联合可扩张矫形装置的临床及短期影像学结果。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):E147-E155. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz402.
2
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
3
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
4
Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?椎间笼前凸是否会影响微创腰椎融合术中实际获得的节段前凸?
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E17. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20393.
5
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage:术后晚期沉降风险增加,但围手术期结局无明显改善:一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
6
Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.术前年龄调整矢状失平衡对退行性腰椎滑脱症单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后影像学和临床结果的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Aug 2;41(4):489-497. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23737. Print 2024 Oct 1.
7
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.多节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:与传统经椎间孔椎间融合术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;85:236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
9
Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.使用可扩张椎间融合器的经小关节微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——第二部分:连续病例系列
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct 15;19(5):518-529. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa144.
10
Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者中可扩张 cage 与不可扩张 cage 在临床和影像学结果方面的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:596-606.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.284. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally-invasive trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion using a dual-dimension expandable cage: preliminary results of a multi-institutional retrospective study.使用二维可扩张椎间融合器的微创经小关节腰椎椎间融合术:多机构回顾性研究的初步结果
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):403-415. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-29. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
The efficacy of 3D gait analysis to evaluate surgical (and rehabilitation) outcome after degenerative lumbar surgery.3D 步态分析评估退行性腰椎手术后手术(和康复)效果的疗效。
BMC Surg. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02486-0.
3
Development of End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Models for Surgical Planning in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术手术规划的端到端人工智能模型的开发
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;11(2):164. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11020164.
4
Exploring the differences in radiologic and clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with single- and bi-planar expandable cages: a systematic review and meta-analysis.探讨单平面和双平面可扩张 cage 经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的影像学和临床结果差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jan 8;47(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02277-w.
5
Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后节段性和整体腰椎前凸的预测因素:连续病例系列研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):425-437. doi: 10.1177/21925682231193610. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
6
Comparison of the efficacy of expandable interbody fusion cage (EXP-IFC) and non-expandable interbody fusion cage (NE-IFC) in MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic retrospective study on 62 patients.可扩张椎间融合器(EXP-IFC)与不可扩张椎间融合器(NE-IFC)在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病中的疗效比较:一项对62例患者的系统性回顾研究
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 18;9:1008171. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1008171. eCollection 2022.
7
Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.静态与可扩张椎间融合器:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术1年临床和影像学结果比较
Asian Spine J. 2023 Feb;17(1):61-74. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0486. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
8
What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后手术节段局部前凸的影响因素是什么?
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jul;63(7):665-674. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.665.
9
Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of MIS-TLIF Intraoperative Implants in Patients with Osteoporosis.比较骨质疏松症患者微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术术中植入物的长期疗效。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Feb 27;2022:2565391. doi: 10.1155/2022/2565391. eCollection 2022.
10
Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中前凸与非前凸静态椎间融合器的影像学及患者报告结局:一项纵向比较队列研究
Cureus. 2022 Jan 15;14(1):e21273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21273. eCollection 2022 Jan.