Suppr超能文献

在有限信息条件下,公众对药物遗传学检测所揭示的辅助信息的态度。

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.

机构信息

Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2011 Aug;13(8):723-8. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821afcc0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pharmacogenetic testing can inform drug dosing and selection by aiding in estimating a patient's genetic risk of adverse response and/or failure to respond. Some pharmacogenetic tests may generate ancillary clinical information unrelated to the drug treatment question for which testing is done-an informational "side effect." We aimed to assess public interest and concerns about pharmacogenetic tests and ancillary information.

METHODS

We conducted a random-digit-dial phone survey of a sample of the US public.

RESULTS

We achieved an overall response rate of 42% (n = 1139). When the potential for ancillary information was presented, 85% (±2.82%) of respondents expressed interest in pharmacogenetic testing, compared with 82% (±3.02%) before discussion of ancillary information. Most respondents (89% ± 2.27%) indicated that physicians should inform patients that a pharmacogenetic test may reveal ancillary risk information before testing is ordered. Respondents' interest in actually learning of the ancillary risk finding significantly differed based on disease severity, availability of an intervention, and test validity, even after adjusting for age, gender, education, and race.

CONCLUSION

Under the limited information conditions presented in the survey, the potential of ancillary information does not negatively impact public interest in pharmacogenetic testing. Interest in learning ancillary information is well aligned with the public's desire to be informed about potential benefits and risks before testing, promoting patient autonomy.

摘要

目的

遗传药理学检测可以通过帮助评估患者对不良反应和/或无应答的遗传风险,为药物剂量和选择提供信息。一些遗传药理学检测可能会产生与检测药物治疗问题无关的辅助临床信息,即信息“副作用”。我们旨在评估公众对遗传药理学检测和辅助信息的兴趣和担忧。

方法

我们对美国公众进行了随机数字拨号电话调查。

结果

我们的总体回复率为 42%(n=1139)。当呈现辅助信息的可能性时,85%(±2.82%)的受访者对遗传药理学检测感兴趣,而在讨论辅助信息之前,这一比例为 82%(±3.02%)。大多数受访者(89%±2.27%)表示,医生应在订购检测前告知患者,遗传药理学检测可能揭示辅助风险信息。即使在调整了年龄、性别、教育程度和种族等因素后,受访者对实际了解辅助风险发现的兴趣仍因疾病严重程度、干预措施的可用性和检测有效性而存在显著差异。

结论

在调查中呈现的有限信息条件下,辅助信息的可能性不会对公众对遗传药理学检测的兴趣产生负面影响。对了解辅助信息的兴趣与公众在检测前了解潜在益处和风险的愿望是一致的,这促进了患者自主权。

相似文献

4
Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.美国公众对药物遗传学检测的态度调查。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Jun;12(3):197-204. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.1. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.美国公众对药物遗传学检测的态度调查。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Jun;12(3):197-204. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.1. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
3
The shared decision-making continuum.共同决策连续体。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):903-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1208.
6
Management of the incidental renal mass.偶发性肾肿物的管理
Radiology. 2008 Oct;249(1):16-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491070783.
10
Genomic research and incidental findings.基因组研究与偶发发现。
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):292-7, 212. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00272.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验