• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.在有限信息条件下,公众对药物遗传学检测所揭示的辅助信息的态度。
Genet Med. 2011 Aug;13(8):723-8. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821afcc0.
2
Public perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings.公众对药物遗传学检测及处理辅助结果的看法。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012 Mar;16(3):193-7. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0118. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
3
Consideration of patient preferences and challenges in storage and access of pharmacogenetic test results.考虑患者对药物遗传学检测结果存储和获取的偏好和挑战。
Genet Med. 2011 Oct;13(10):887-90. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31822077a5.
4
Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.美国公众对药物遗传学检测的态度调查。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Jun;12(3):197-204. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.1. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
5
Professional perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings.关于药物遗传学检测及处理辅助发现的专业观点。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012 Jan;16(1):21-4. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0045. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
6
Physicians' opinions following pharmacogenetic testing for psychotropic medication.精神药物治疗的药物遗传学检测后医生的观点。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Oct 30;229(3):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.032. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
7
Positive perception of pharmacogenetic testing for psychotropic medications.对精神药物药物遗传学检测的积极认知。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014 May;29(3):287-91. doi: 10.1002/hup.2383. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of Pharmacogenetic Testing in an Inner-City Population.促进和阻碍在城市内人群中采用药物遗传学检测的因素。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Feb;38(2):205-216. doi: 10.1002/phar.2077. Epub 2018 Jan 21.
9
How interested is the public in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility? Report of a cross-sectional population survey.公众对结肠癌易感性基因检测的兴趣如何?一项横断面人群调查的报告。
Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Aug;2(4):167-72.
10
Ancillary risk information and pharmacogenetic tests: social and policy implications.辅助风险信息与药物遗传学检测:社会及政策影响
Pharmacogenomics J. 2008 Apr;8(2):85-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500457. Epub 2007 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
'. Stakeholders' perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV.. 利益相关者对向艾滋病毒感染者反馈个人药物基因组学研究结果的伦理考量的看法。
Res Ethics. 2024 Apr;20(2):363-387. doi: 10.1177/17470161231207739. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
2
Spotlighting Structural Constraints on Decisions About Participation in Genomic and Precision Medicine.聚焦参与基因组学与精准医学决策的结构限制因素
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):87-92. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2355893. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
The role of community engagement in promoting research participants' understanding of pharmacogenomic research results: Perspectives of stakeholders involved in HIV/AIDS research and treatment.社区参与在促进研究参与者对药物基因组学研究结果的理解中的作用:参与 HIV/AIDS 研究和治疗的利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0299081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299081. eCollection 2024.
4
Personalizing Personalized Medicine: The Confluence of Pharmacogenomics, a Person's Medication Experience and Ethics.个性化精准医疗:药物基因组学、个人用药体验与伦理学的融合
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;11(3):101. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030101.
5
Parental Preferences about Policy Options Regarding Disclosure of Incidental Genetic Findings in Newborn Screening: Using Videos and the Internet to Educate and Obtain Input.父母对新生儿筛查中偶然基因发现披露政策选项的偏好:利用视频和互联网进行教育并获取意见。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Sep 27;8(4):54. doi: 10.3390/ijns8040054.
6
A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Experiences with Pharmacogenomic Testing among Patients and the General Public: Implications for Patient Counseling.患者及普通公众对药物基因组检测的态度与体验的范围综述:对患者咨询的启示
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):425. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030425.
7
Revisiting Secondary Information Related to Pharmacogenetic Testing.重新审视与药物遗传学检测相关的二级信息。
Front Genet. 2021 Oct 1;12:741395. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.741395. eCollection 2021.
8
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) in Clinical Genetics Research.临床遗传学研究中的伦理、法律和社会问题 (ELSI)。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:65-82. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_5.
9
Researchers' perspectives on return of individual genetics results to research participants: a qualitative study.研究人员对向研究参与者反馈个人基因检测结果的看法:一项定性研究。
Glob Bioeth. 2021 Mar 9;32(1):15-33. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1896453.
10
Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings.责任、身份认同与基因组测序:已发表建议与患者对接受或拒绝偶然发现的观点之比较
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018 Nov;6(6):1079-1096. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.485. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.美国公众对药物遗传学检测的态度调查。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Jun;12(3):197-204. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.1. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
2
Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden.影像研究中的偶然发现:评估发生率、益处和负担。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1525-32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.317.
3
The shared decision-making continuum.共同决策连续体。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):903-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1208.
4
Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.消费者对直接面向消费者的个性化基因组风险评估的看法。
Genet Med. 2010 Sep;12(9):556-66. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181eb51c6.
5
CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies.商业 SNP 芯片上经 CLIA 检测的遗传变异:全基因组关联研究中偶然发现的可能性。
Genet Med. 2010 Jun;12(6):355-63. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e1e2a9.
6
Management of the incidental renal mass.偶发性肾肿物的管理
Radiology. 2008 Oct;249(1):16-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491070783.
7
Pharmacogenomic biomarker information in drug labels approved by the United States food and drug administration: prevalence of related drug use.美国食品药品监督管理局批准的药品标签中的药物基因组生物标志物信息:相关药物使用情况
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Aug;28(8):992-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.8.992.
8
Primary care physicians' willingness to offer a new genetic test to tailor smoking treatment, according to test characteristics.根据检测特征,基层医疗医生提供一种新的基因检测以定制吸烟治疗方案的意愿。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jun;10(6):1037-45. doi: 10.1080/14622200802087580.
9
The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.人类受试者研究中的偶然发现法则:确立研究者的职责
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):361-83, 214. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00281.x.
10
Genomic research and incidental findings.基因组研究与偶发发现。
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):292-7, 212. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00272.x.

在有限信息条件下,公众对药物遗传学检测所揭示的辅助信息的态度。

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.

机构信息

Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2011 Aug;13(8):723-8. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821afcc0.

DOI:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821afcc0
PMID:21633294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3150617/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pharmacogenetic testing can inform drug dosing and selection by aiding in estimating a patient's genetic risk of adverse response and/or failure to respond. Some pharmacogenetic tests may generate ancillary clinical information unrelated to the drug treatment question for which testing is done-an informational "side effect." We aimed to assess public interest and concerns about pharmacogenetic tests and ancillary information.

METHODS

We conducted a random-digit-dial phone survey of a sample of the US public.

RESULTS

We achieved an overall response rate of 42% (n = 1139). When the potential for ancillary information was presented, 85% (±2.82%) of respondents expressed interest in pharmacogenetic testing, compared with 82% (±3.02%) before discussion of ancillary information. Most respondents (89% ± 2.27%) indicated that physicians should inform patients that a pharmacogenetic test may reveal ancillary risk information before testing is ordered. Respondents' interest in actually learning of the ancillary risk finding significantly differed based on disease severity, availability of an intervention, and test validity, even after adjusting for age, gender, education, and race.

CONCLUSION

Under the limited information conditions presented in the survey, the potential of ancillary information does not negatively impact public interest in pharmacogenetic testing. Interest in learning ancillary information is well aligned with the public's desire to be informed about potential benefits and risks before testing, promoting patient autonomy.

摘要

目的

遗传药理学检测可以通过帮助评估患者对不良反应和/或无应答的遗传风险,为药物剂量和选择提供信息。一些遗传药理学检测可能会产生与检测药物治疗问题无关的辅助临床信息,即信息“副作用”。我们旨在评估公众对遗传药理学检测和辅助信息的兴趣和担忧。

方法

我们对美国公众进行了随机数字拨号电话调查。

结果

我们的总体回复率为 42%(n=1139)。当呈现辅助信息的可能性时,85%(±2.82%)的受访者对遗传药理学检测感兴趣,而在讨论辅助信息之前,这一比例为 82%(±3.02%)。大多数受访者(89%±2.27%)表示,医生应在订购检测前告知患者,遗传药理学检测可能揭示辅助风险信息。即使在调整了年龄、性别、教育程度和种族等因素后,受访者对实际了解辅助风险发现的兴趣仍因疾病严重程度、干预措施的可用性和检测有效性而存在显著差异。

结论

在调查中呈现的有限信息条件下,辅助信息的可能性不会对公众对遗传药理学检测的兴趣产生负面影响。对了解辅助信息的兴趣与公众在检测前了解潜在益处和风险的愿望是一致的,这促进了患者自主权。