• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应性AC/A比率:不同注视距离下调节诱发与调节放松之间的差异。

The response AC/A ratio: differences between inducing and relaxing accommodation at different distances of fixation.

作者信息

Pankhania Supna R, Firth Alison Y

机构信息

Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, K Floor, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.

出版信息

Strabismus. 2011 Jun;19(2):52-6. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2011.578192.

DOI:10.3109/09273972.2011.578192
PMID:21635166
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if there is a difference between the response AC/A ratios when measured using the gradient method at near and distance fixation with plus and minus lenses respectively in young adults with normal binocular single vision.

METHODS

A repeated measures design was used. The accommodative response of the right eye was measured objectively using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor (Grand Seiko Company, Fukuyama, Japan) (open view) at 33 cm with and without plus lenses (2DS or 3DS) and at 3.8 m with and without minus lenses (2DS or 3DS) dependent on the participants' ability to obtain subjectively "clear" vision. The angle of deviation was measured using the alternate prism cover test at 33 cm and 3.8m fixing with the right eye with the participant sat at the autorefractor. LogMAR 0.0 (6/6) was used for fixation. Response AC/A ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five participants were examined; mean and standard deviation of their ages were 21.2 ± 4.04 years. The mean and standard deviation of the near response AC/A ratios was 4.73 ± 2.34/1 and at distance was 3.05 ± 1.71/1. Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient showed no correlation between the 2 sets of data. Paired t-test showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the near and distance response AC/A ratios (t = 3.30, p = 0.003). The difference was found to be greater in participants who were non-orthoptic students.

CONCLUSION

The response AC/A ratio was found to be slightly higher at 33 cm with plus lenses than at 3.8 m with minus lenses. No reason was identified for this difference but adaptation and perceptual effects could be further explored.

摘要

目的

确定在具有正常双眼单视的年轻成年人中,分别使用梯度法在近距和远距注视时,使用正负透镜测量的调节反应性AC/A比率之间是否存在差异。

方法

采用重复测量设计。使用日本福山精工株式会社生产的新日本SRW-5000自动验光仪(开放式视野),根据参与者主观获得“清晰”视力的能力,在33厘米处有或没有正透镜(2DS或3DS)以及在3.8米处有或没有负透镜(2DS或3DS)的情况下客观测量右眼的调节反应。在参与者坐在自动验光仪前,用右眼在33厘米和3.8米处注视时,使用交替棱镜遮盖试验测量偏斜角度。使用LogMAR 0.0(6/6)进行注视。计算调节反应性AC/A比率。

结果

检查了25名参与者;他们的年龄均值和标准差分别为21.2±4.04岁。近距调节反应性AC/A比率的均值和标准差为4.73±2.34/棱镜度,远距为3.05±1.71/棱镜度。皮尔逊积矩相关系数显示两组数据之间无相关性。配对t检验显示近距和远距调节反应性AC/A比率之间存在统计学显著差异(t = 3.30,p = 0.003)。发现这种差异在非视光学专业学生中更大。

结论

发现使用正透镜在33厘米处的调节反应性AC/A比率略高于使用负透镜在3.8米处的比率。未确定造成这种差异的原因,但可以进一步探讨适应性和感知效应。

相似文献

1
The response AC/A ratio: differences between inducing and relaxing accommodation at different distances of fixation.反应性AC/A比率:不同注视距离下调节诱发与调节放松之间的差异。
Strabismus. 2011 Jun;19(2):52-6. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2011.578192.
2
Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?使用自动验光仪(Grand-Seiko WV-500)进行复验验光时涉及的系统测量误差:通过眼镜镜片测量调节滞后是否有效?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 May;27(3):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00466.x.
3
The effect of altering spherical aberration on the static accommodative response.改变球差对静态调节反应的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Jan;29(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00610.x.
4
Differences in the Stimulus Accommodative Convergence/Accommodation Ratio using Various Techniques and Accommodative Stimuli.使用各种技术和调节刺激时刺激调节性集合/调节比率的差异。
Strabismus. 2018 Jun;26(2):53-61. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2018.1459746. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Technical note: effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations.技术说明:隐形眼镜对调节微波动测量的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jan;28(1):91-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00522.x.
6
Comparison of a monocular pupillometer and the pupillometry function of a binocular free-viewing autorefractor.单目瞳孔计与双目自由浏览自动验光仪瞳孔测量功能的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.026. Epub 2011 May 20.
7
Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.通过近附加镜片观察时调节和聚散反应的变化。
Optometry. 2007 Mar;78(3):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2006.08.017.
8
Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children.近视和正视儿童对+2D镜片的双眼适应性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;86(6):731-40. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a59d78.
9
Non-linearity of the response accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.调节性集合与调节比率反应的非线性。
Strabismus. 2013 Sep;21(3):175-82. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2013.811604.
10
Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.1CU可调节人工晶状体的客观调节幅度和动态变化
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):1230-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0939.

引用本文的文献

1
The clinical near gradient stimulus AC/A ratio correlates better with the response CA/C ratio than with the response AC/A ratio.临床近距离梯度刺激AC/A比率与反应性CA/C比率的相关性比与反应性AC/A比率的相关性更好。
Strabismus. 2013 Jun;21(2):140-4. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2013.786741.
2
Concurrent vision dysfunctions in convergence insufficiency with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤合并集合不足时的并发视觉功能障碍
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Dec;89(12):1740-51. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182772dce.