Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford OX1 3LB, UK.
J Theor Biol. 2011 Aug 21;283(1):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 May 27.
The currently accepted interpretation of the clock and wavefront model of somitogenesis is that a posteriorly moving molecular gradient sequentially slows the rate of clock oscillations, resulting in a spatial readout of temporal oscillations. However, while molecular components of the clocks and wavefronts have now been identified in the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM), there is not yet conclusive evidence demonstrating that the observed molecular wavefronts act to slow clock oscillations. Here we present an alternative formulation of the clock and wavefront model in which oscillator coupling, already known to play a key role in oscillator synchronisation, plays a fundamentally important role in the slowing of oscillations along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis. Our model has three parameters which can be determined, in any given species, by the measurement of three quantities: the clock period in the posterior PSM, somite length and the length of the PSM. A travelling wavefront, which slows oscillations along the AP axis, is an emergent feature of the model. Using the model we predict: (a) the distance between moving stripes of gene expression; (b) the number of moving stripes of gene expression and (c) the oscillator period profile along the AP axis. Predictions regarding the stripe data are verified using existing zebrafish data. We simulate a range of experimental perturbations and demonstrate how the model can be used to unambiguously define a reference frame along the AP axis. Comparing data from zebrafish, chick, mouse and snake, we demonstrate that: (a) variation in patterning profiles is accounted for by a single nondimensional parameter; the ratio of coupling strengths; and (b) the period profile along the AP axis is conserved across species. Thus the model is consistent with the idea that, although the genes involved in pattern propagation in the PSM vary, there is a conserved patterning mechanism across species.
目前对体节形成的时钟和波前模型的解释是,一个向后移动的分子梯度会依次降低时钟振荡的速率,从而实现时间振荡的空间读取。然而,虽然已经在体节前中胚层(PSM)中确定了时钟和波前的分子成分,但目前还没有确凿的证据表明观察到的分子波前确实会降低时钟的振荡速度。在这里,我们提出了一种时钟和波前模型的替代形式,其中已经知道振荡器耦合在振荡器同步中起着关键作用,在沿前后(AP)轴的振荡减慢中起着至关重要的作用。我们的模型有三个参数,可以通过测量三个量来确定:在后 PSM 中的时钟周期、体节长度和 PSM 的长度。一个沿 AP 轴减慢振荡的移动波前是模型的一个突出特征。使用该模型,我们预测:(a)基因表达移动条纹之间的距离;(b)基因表达移动条纹的数量;(c)沿 AP 轴的振荡器周期分布。使用现有的斑马鱼数据验证了关于条纹数据的预测。我们模拟了一系列实验干扰,并展示了如何使用该模型明确定义 AP 轴上的参考框架。比较来自斑马鱼、鸡、鼠和蛇的数据,我们证明:(a)通过单一无量纲参数——耦合强度比来解释图案形成的变化;(b)沿 AP 轴的周期分布在不同物种中是保守的。因此,该模型与这样一种观点一致,即尽管 PSM 中涉及模式传播的基因存在差异,但不同物种中存在着保守的模式形成机制。