Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Ann Anat. 2012 Jan 20;194(1):58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 11.
Molecular studies of archival and fossil samples have traditionally focused on the nucleic acids derived from the host species. However, there has recently been an increase in ancient DNA research on the identification and characterization of infectious agents within the hosts. The study of pathogens from the past provides great opportunities for discovering the causes of historical infection events, characterizing host-microorganism co-evolution and directly investigating the evolution of specific pathogens. Several research teams have been able to isolate and characterize a variety of different bacterial, parasite and viral microorganisms. However, this emerging field is not without obstacles. The diagenetic processes that make ancient DNA research generally difficult are also impediments to ancient pathogen research and perhaps more so given that their DNA may represent an even rarer proportion of the remaining nucleic acids in a fossil sample than host DNA. However, studies performed under controlled conditions and following stringent ancient DNA protocols can and have yielded reliable and often surprising results. This article reviews the advantages, problems, and failures of ancient microbiological research.
分子研究档案和化石样本一直集中在从宿主物种衍生的核酸。然而,最近对宿主内传染病原体的鉴定和特征的古代 DNA 研究有所增加。对过去病原体的研究为发现历史感染事件的原因、描述宿主-微生物共同进化以及直接研究特定病原体的进化提供了极好的机会。几个研究小组已经能够分离和鉴定各种不同的细菌、寄生虫和病毒微生物。然而,这个新兴领域并非没有障碍。使古代 DNA 研究变得困难的成岩作用过程也阻碍了古代病原体的研究,而且由于它们的 DNA 可能代表化石样本中剩余核酸中比宿主 DNA 更罕见的一部分,因此这种阻碍可能更为严重。然而,在严格控制的条件下并遵循严格的古代 DNA 方案进行的研究可以而且已经产生了可靠的、常常令人惊讶的结果。本文综述了古代微生物学研究的优势、问题和失败。