Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2025, USA.
Acc Chem Res. 2011 Aug 16;44(8):603-13. doi: 10.1021/ar200055y. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
Using two transition metals to simultaneously catalyze a reaction can offer distinct opportunities for reactivity and selectivity when compared to using single-metal catalyst systems. Creating dual transition metal catalytic systems is complicated, however, by challenges in predicting compatible reactivities and designing turnover pathways for both metals. In this Account, we describe our development of dual-metal catalysis reactions involving gold and a second transition metal. The unique rearrangement intermediates accessible through gold-only catalysis, which exploits the soft Lewis acidity of Au(I), make gold an attractive partner for dual-metal catalysis reactions. Because of the complexity of achieving simultaneous turnover of two catalysts and predicting compatibilities, our approach has been to first gain a fundamental understanding of the reactivity of the two metals with each other, both in stoichiometric and monocatalyzed reactions. To this end, we have investigated the combined reactivity of organogold compounds with palladium, nickel, and rhodium. We narrate the intricacies of turning over two catalysts simultaneously and thereby illuminate the valuable role of fundamental studies in identifying the optimal conditions to promote desirable two-metal reactivity and compatibility. Transmetalation, redox reactivity, and new mechanisms for dual-metal catalytic turnover were probed from this standpoint. We have applied the knowledge gained through these studies to the development of reactions that are dual-catalyzed by gold and palladium, as well as nickel- and rhodium-catalyzed reactions of organogold compounds. More broadly, these new reactions expand the reactivity available to catalytic organogold intermediates via trapping and functionalization reactions with other transition metals. Our investigations reveal strategies useful for designing dual-metal reactions with gold. First, the versatility of gold as a transmetalation partner suggests that many potential methods may exist to intercept catalytic organogold intermediates with a second transition metal. Second, ligands on both metals should be selected carefully in order to prevent catalyst deactivation. Finally, reactions must be designed such that any oxidative steps involving the second metal outcompete undesired reactions with redox-active organogold compounds. We believe that the application of these principles will allow for the design of a diverse set of dual-catalyzed functionalizations befitting the wide variety of gold-catalyzed transformations already established.
使用两种过渡金属同时催化反应,与使用单金属催化剂体系相比,可以为反应性和选择性提供独特的机会。然而,创建双过渡金属催化体系很复杂,因为在预测两种金属的兼容性和设计周转途径方面存在挑战。在本报告中,我们描述了我们开发的涉及金和第二种过渡金属的双金属催化反应。金只能催化可以获得的独特重排中间体,利用 Au(I) 的软路易斯酸度,使金成为双金属催化反应的理想伙伴。由于实现两种催化剂同时周转和预测兼容性的复杂性,我们的方法是首先深入了解两种金属彼此之间的反应性,包括计量和单催化反应。为此,我们研究了有机金化合物与钯、镍和铑的组合反应性。我们讲述了同时翻转两种催化剂的复杂性,从而阐明了基础研究在确定最佳条件以促进理想的双金属反应性和兼容性方面的宝贵作用。从这个角度探讨了双金属催化周转的转金属化、氧化还原反应性和新机制。我们从这些研究中获得的知识应用于金和钯双催化反应以及有机金化合物的镍和铑催化反应的开发。更广泛地说,这些新反应通过与其他过渡金属的捕获和官能化反应扩展了催化有机金中间体的反应性。我们的研究揭示了设计与金的双金属反应的有用策略。首先,金作为转金属化伙伴的多功能性表明,可能存在许多潜在的方法来用第二种过渡金属拦截催化有机金中间体。其次,两种金属上的配体都应仔细选择,以防止催化剂失活。最后,反应必须设计成使得涉及第二种金属的任何氧化步骤都胜过与氧化还原活性有机金化合物的不期望反应。我们相信,这些原则的应用将允许设计一组多样化的双催化官能化,适合已经建立的广泛的金催化转化。