Materials Science and Chemical Engineering Department, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy.
Acta Biomater. 2011 Sep;7(9):3248-66. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 May 20.
Treatment of orbital floor fractures and defects is often a complex issue. Repair of these injuries essentially aims to restore the continuity of the orbital floor and to provide an adequate support to the orbital content. Several materials and implants have been proposed over the years for orbital floor reconstruction, in the hope of achieving the best clinical outcome for the patient. Autografts have been traditionally considered as the "gold standard" choice due to the absence of an adverse immunological response, but they are available in limited amounts and carry the need for extra surgery. In order to overcome the drawbacks related to autografts, researchers' and surgeons' attention has been progressively attracted by alloplastic materials, which can be commercially produced and easily tailored to fit a wide range of specific clinical needs. In this review the advantages and limitations of the various biomaterials proposed and tested for orbital floor repair are critically examined and discussed. Criteria and guidelines for optimal material/implant choice, as well as future research directions, are also presented, in an attempt to understand whether an ideal biomaterial already exists or a truly functional implant will eventually materialise in the next few years.
治疗眼眶底骨折和缺损通常是一个复杂的问题。这些损伤的修复主要旨在恢复眼眶底的连续性,并为眼眶内容物提供足够的支撑。多年来,已经提出了几种材料和植入物来进行眼眶底重建,以期为患者获得最佳的临床效果。由于不存在免疫不良反应,自体移植物一直被认为是“金标准”选择,但它们的数量有限,并且需要额外的手术。为了克服与自体移植物相关的缺点,研究人员和外科医生的注意力逐渐被可商购的同种异体材料所吸引,这些材料可以进行批量生产,并且可以轻松地根据各种特定的临床需求进行定制。在这篇综述中,批判性地检查和讨论了用于眼眶底修复的各种生物材料的优缺点。还提出了最佳材料/植入物选择的标准和指南,以及未来的研究方向,试图了解是否已经存在理想的生物材料,或者在未来几年内是否会真正实现功能植入物。