• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于学校的普遍性暴力预防计划对暴力犯罪的影响:对有虐待史的青少年有独特的益处。

Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on violent delinquency: distinctive benefits for youth with maltreatment histories.

机构信息

CAMH Centre for Prevention Science, 100 Collip Circle, Ste. 100, London, Ontario N69 4X8, Canada.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.002
PMID:21652072
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Child maltreatment constitutes a strong risk factor for violent delinquency in adolescence, with cumulative experiences of maltreatment creating increasingly greater risk. Our previous work demonstrated that a universal school-based violence prevention program could provide a protective impact for youth at risk for violent delinquency due to child maltreatment history. In this study we conducted a follow-up to determine if participation in a school-based violence prevention program in grade 9 continued to provide a buffering effect on engaging in acts of violent delinquency for maltreated youth, 2 years post-intervention.

METHODS

Secondary analyses were conducted using data from a cluster randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive school-based violence prevention program. Students (N=1,722; 52.8% female) from 20 schools participated in 21 75-min lessons in grade 9 health classes. Individual data (i.e., gender, child maltreatment experiences, and violent delinquency in grade 9) and school-level data (i.e., student perception of safety averaged across students in each school) were entered in a multilevel model to predict violent delinquency at the end of grade 11.

RESULTS

Individual- and school-level factors predicting violent delinquency in grade 11 replicated previous findings from grade 9: being male, experiencing child maltreatment, being violent in grade 9, and attending a school with a lower perceived sense of safety among the entire student body increased violent delinquency. The cross-level interaction of individual maltreatment history and school-level intervention was also replicated: in non-intervention schools, youth with more maltreatment in their background were increasingly likely to engage in violent delinquency. The strength of this relationship was significantly attenuated in intervention schools.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up findings are consistent with the buffering effect of the prevention program previously found post-intervention for the subsample of youth with maltreatment histories.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A relative inexpensive school-based violence prevention program that has been shown to reduce dating violence among the whole student body also creates a protective effect for maltreated youth with respect to lowering their likelihood of engaging in violent delinquency.

摘要

目的

儿童虐待是青少年暴力犯罪的一个强有力的风险因素,虐待经历的累积会带来越来越大的风险。我们之前的工作表明,一项普遍的学校暴力预防计划可以为有儿童虐待史的暴力犯罪高危青年提供保护。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项随访,以确定在干预后 2 年,参加 9 年级学校暴力预防计划是否继续对遭受虐待的青年从事暴力犯罪行为产生缓冲作用。

方法

使用一项综合学校暴力预防计划的集群随机对照试验的数据进行二次分析。来自 20 所学校的 1722 名学生(52.8%为女性)参加了 9 年级健康课的 21 节 75 分钟的课程。个体数据(即性别、儿童虐待经历和 9 年级的暴力犯罪)和学校水平数据(即每个学校学生平均的学生安全感知)被输入多层模型,以预测 11 年级末的暴力犯罪。

结果

个体和学校水平因素预测 11 年级的暴力犯罪与 9 年级的研究结果一致:男性、经历儿童虐待、9 年级暴力犯罪以及就读于整个学生群体安全感知较低的学校会增加暴力犯罪。个体虐待史和学校干预的跨水平交互作用也得到了复制:在非干预学校中,背景中虐待经历较多的青年越来越有可能从事暴力犯罪。这种关系的强度在干预学校中显著减弱。

结论

随访结果与先前干预后发现的预防计划的缓冲效应一致,即对于有虐待史的青年亚组。

实践意义

一项相对廉价的学校暴力预防计划,已经被证明可以减少全体学生中的约会暴力,也为遭受虐待的青年创造了一种保护效应,降低他们从事暴力犯罪的可能性。

相似文献

1
Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on violent delinquency: distinctive benefits for youth with maltreatment histories.一项基于学校的普遍性暴力预防计划对暴力犯罪的影响:对有虐待史的青少年有独特的益处。
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
Understanding the link between childhood maltreatment and violent delinquency: what do schools have to add?理解童年期受虐与暴力犯罪之间的联系:学校能起到什么作用?
Child Maltreat. 2007 Aug;12(3):269-80. doi: 10.1177/1077559507301843.
3
Adolescent violence perpetration: associations with multiple types of adverse childhood experiences.青少年暴力行为:与多种类型的不良童年经历有关。
Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e778-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0597. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
4
The contribution of childhood emotional abuse to teen dating violence among child protective services-involved youth.童年期情感虐待对涉及儿童保护服务的青少年约会暴力行为的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
5
The cycle of violence and victimization: a study of the school-based intervention of a multidisciplinary youth violence-prevention program.暴力与受害循环:一项关于多学科青少年暴力预防计划的校本干预研究。
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;12(5 Suppl):109-19.
6
Child maltreatment: risk of adjustment problems and dating violence in adolescence.儿童虐待:青少年出现适应问题和约会暴力的风险。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;40(3):282-9. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200103000-00007.
7
Epidemiology of juvenile violence.青少年暴力的流行病学
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2000 Oct;9(4):733-48.
8
Violence perpetration among urban american Indian youth: can protection offset risk?美国城市印第安青年中的暴力行为:保护因素能否抵消风险?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Mar;159(3):270-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.3.270.
9
Concurrent risk factors for adolescent violence.青少年暴力的并发风险因素。
J Adolesc Health. 1996 Aug;19(2):94-103. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(96)00131-0.
10
Risk and direct protective factors for youth violence: results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.青少年暴力的风险和直接保护因素:来自全国青少年健康纵向研究的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map.应对机构内儿童虐待的干预措施:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;17(1):e1139. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1139. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Motivational Interview Techniques and the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs With Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.动机访谈技巧与干预项目对亲密伴侣暴力加害者的有效性:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2691-2710. doi: 10.1177/15248380221111472. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
A Dating Violence Prevention Program for Middle School Youth: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
中学青少年约会暴力预防计划:一项整群随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2021 Nov;148(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052880. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Is There an Ace Up Our Sleeve? A Review of Interventions and Strategies for Addressing Behavioral and Neurobiological Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Youth.我们有锦囊妙计吗?关于应对青少年不良童年经历的行为和神经生物学影响的干预措施及策略的综述
Advers Resil Sci. 2020 Mar;1(1):5-28. doi: 10.1007/s42844-020-00001-x. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
5
Boys are victims too? Sexual dating violence and injury among high-risk youth.男孩也是受害者?高危青少年中的性约会暴力和伤害。
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Evaluation of the expect respect support group program: A violence prevention strategy for youth exposed to violence.评估期待尊重支持小组项目:针对遭受暴力的青年的暴力预防策略。
Prev Med. 2017 Jul;100:235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Child Maltreatment and the Adolescent Patient With Severe Obesity: Implications for Clinical Care.儿童虐待与重度肥胖青少年患者:对临床护理的影响
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Aug;40(7):640-8. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv011. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
8
Do Parenting Practices and Pro-social Peers Moderate the Association between Intimate Partner Violence Exposure and Teen Dating Violence?养育方式和亲社会同伴是否会调节亲密伴侣暴力暴露与青少年约会暴力之间的关联?
Psychol Violence. 2013 Oct;3(4):354-366. doi: 10.1037/a0034036.
9
Shared longitudinal predictors of physical peer and dating violence.身体同伴暴力和约会暴力的共同纵向预测因素。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jan;56(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
10
Observations of adolescent peer resistance skills following a classroom-based healthy relationship program: a post-intervention comparison.基于课堂的健康关系项目后青少年同伴抵制技能的观察:干预后比较。
Prev Sci. 2012 Apr;13(2):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0256-z.