• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施和评估首个德国青少年照顾者项目:意图、陷阱及对复杂干预措施进行试点的必要性。

Implementing and evaluating the first german young-carers project: intentions, pitfalls and the need for piloting complex interventions.

作者信息

Schlarmann Jörg Große, Metzing-Blau Sabine, Schnepp Wilfried

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Straße 12, D-58453 Witten, Germany.

出版信息

Open Nurs J. 2011;5:38-44. doi: 10.2174/1874434601105010038. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

DOI:10.2174/1874434601105010038
PMID:21660183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3109739/
Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop, implement and evaluate a concept for the first support program for young carers and their families in Germany. This paper intends to critically review the implementation of that study and describe the problems experienced by the research team, including: the complexity of the intervention itself, the difficulty of finding host organizations, the lack of infrastructure, different values and beliefs about the project aims held between the host organization and the research team, shortage of time, identifying and recruiting families among the hidden population of young carers. These initial problems led to the re-constructuring of the original research design. In order to evaluate factors that influenced these difficulties, the original research intentions, emerging problems and their consequences will be presented.

摘要

该研究的目的是为德国年轻护理者及其家庭的首个支持项目制定、实施并评估一个概念。本文旨在批判性地审视该研究的实施情况,并描述研究团队所遇到的问题,包括:干预措施本身的复杂性、寻找主办机构的困难、基础设施的匮乏、主办机构与研究团队之间对项目目标存在不同的价值观和信念、时间短缺、在年轻护理者这一隐蔽群体中识别和招募家庭。这些初期问题导致了对原研究设计的重新构建。为了评估影响这些困难的因素,将呈现原研究意图、新出现的问题及其后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a69e/3109739/17d6fdc002f6/TONURSJ-5-38_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a69e/3109739/29f9df25008c/TONURSJ-5-38_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a69e/3109739/17d6fdc002f6/TONURSJ-5-38_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a69e/3109739/29f9df25008c/TONURSJ-5-38_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a69e/3109739/17d6fdc002f6/TONURSJ-5-38_F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing and evaluating the first german young-carers project: intentions, pitfalls and the need for piloting complex interventions.实施和评估首个德国青少年照顾者项目:意图、陷阱及对复杂干预措施进行试点的必要性。
Open Nurs J. 2011;5:38-44. doi: 10.2174/1874434601105010038. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
5
Assessing the effect of a complex psychosocial intervention: a methodological note on determining measurement intervals.评估复杂心理社会干预的效果:关于确定测量间隔的方法学说明
Nurse Res. 2011;18(4):33-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.33.c8634.
6
7
Community readiness assessment for obesity research: pilot implementation of the Healthier Families programme.社区肥胖研究准备度评估:健康家庭计划的试点实施。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jan 15;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0262-0.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
[Children and adolescents as caregivers: who they are and what they do. An international literature review (1990-2006)].[作为照料者的儿童和青少年:他们是谁以及他们做什么。一项国际文献综述(1990 - 2006年)]
Pflege. 2007 Dec;20(6):323-30. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.20.6.323.
10
Comparison of the adaptive implementation and evaluation of the Meeting Centers Support Program for people with dementia and their family carers in Europe; study protocol of the MEETINGDEM project.欧洲痴呆症患者及其家庭护理人员会议中心支持计划的适应性实施与评估比较;MEETINGDEM项目研究方案
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0472-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Invisible population: Understanding recruitment barriers of a nurse-led support programme for families with caregiving children in Austria.隐形人群:了解奥地利以护士为主导的家庭照顾者支持计划的招募障碍。
Nurs Open. 2020 Apr 16;7(4):1164-1172. doi: 10.1002/nop2.491. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Germany's First Young Carers Project's Impact on the Children: Relieving the Entire Family. A Qualitative Evaluation.德国首个青少年照顾者项目对儿童的影响:减轻整个家庭的负担。一项定性评估。
Open Nurs J. 2011;5:86-94. doi: 10.2174/1874434601105010086. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
RCTs in complex nursing interventions and laboratory experimental studies.复杂护理干预和实验室实验研究中的随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Apr;46(4):588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
2
Young carers in Germany: to live on as normal as possible - a grounded theory study.德国的青少年照顾者:尽可能正常地生活——一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Nurs. 2008 Dec 24;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-15.
3
The use of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents as an outcome criterion to evaluate family oriented support for young carers in Germany: an integrative review of the literature.
将儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)作为评估德国对年轻照顾者的家庭导向支持的结果标准:文献综合综述
BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 17;8:414. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-414.
4
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
5
Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions.评估复杂医疗保健干预措施中的方法学问题。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jun;54(5):612-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03869.x.
6
What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.哪些因素会影响随机对照试验的受试者招募?对由两家英国资助机构资助的试验的综述。
Trials. 2006 Apr 7;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9.
7
The development of evidence-based nursing interventions: methodological considerations.循证护理干预措施的发展:方法学考量
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Oct;48(1):84-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03171.x.
8
Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability?社会复杂性护理干预的随机对照试验:是否会产生偏差和不可靠性?
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jan;45(1):84-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02864.x.
9
Adults' recollections of their experiences as young caregivers of family members with chronic physical illnesses.成年人对自己年轻时照顾患有慢性身体疾病家庭成员经历的回忆。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 May;34(3):320-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01761.x.
10
Youngsters caring for adults with cancer.照顾成年癌症患者的青少年。
Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(1):11-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01229.x.