Department of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:219-27. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S18461. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the association between morphological phenotypes according to the predominance of emphysema and efficacy of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and β(2) agonist bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Seventy-two patients with stable COPD treated with tiotropium (n = 41) or salmeterol (n = 31) were evaluated for pulmonary function, dynamic hyperinflation following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation, six-minute walking distance, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) before and 2-3 months following treatment with tiotropium or salmeterol. They were then visually divided into an emphysema dominant phenotype (n = 25 in the tiotropium-treated group and n = 22 in the salmeterol-treated group) and an emphysema nondominant phenotype on high-resolution computed tomography, and the efficacy of the two drugs in each phenotype was retrospectively analyzed.
Tiotropium significantly improved airflow limitation, oxygenation, and respiratory impedance in both the emphysema dominant and emphysema nondominant phenotypes, and improved dynamic hyperinflation, exercise capacity, and SGRQ in the emphysema dominant phenotype but not in the emphysema nondominant phenotype. Salmeterol significantly improved total score for SGRQ in the emphysema phenotype, but no significant effects on other parameters were found for either of the phenotypes.
These findings suggest that tiotropium is more effective than salmeterol for airflow limitation regardless of emphysema dominance, and also can improve dynamic hyperinflation in the emphysema dominant phenotype, which results in further improvement of exercise capacity and health-related quality of life.
本研究旨在阐明根据肺气肿的优势,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的形态表型与长效抗毒蕈碱药和β(2)激动剂支气管扩张剂疗效之间的关系。
72 例稳定期 COPD 患者接受噻托溴铵(n = 41)或沙美特罗(n = 31)治疗,在治疗前和治疗后 2-3 个月,评估肺功能、节拍器递增性过度通气后动态过度充气、6 分钟步行距离和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ),并根据高分辨率 CT 将患者分为肺气肿优势表型(噻托溴铵治疗组 n = 25,沙美特罗治疗组 n = 22)和非肺气肿优势表型,然后回顾性分析两种药物在每种表型中的疗效。
噻托溴铵显著改善了两种表型的气流受限、氧合和呼吸阻抗,并改善了肺气肿优势表型的动态过度充气、运动能力和 SGRQ,但对非肺气肿优势表型无明显影响。沙美特罗显著改善了 SGRQ 的总分,但对两种表型的其他参数均无显著影响。
这些发现表明,无论肺气肿优势如何,噻托溴铵治疗气流受限的疗效均优于沙美特罗,而且还能改善肺气肿优势表型的动态过度充气,从而进一步改善运动能力和健康相关生活质量。