• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前腿部疼痛和神经根病对单节段腰椎全椎间盘置换术疗效的影响:一项全国性登记研究的结果

Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.

机构信息

Institute for Evaluative Research in Medicine, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S729-36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1863-x. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-1863-x
PMID:21660458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3535221/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Currently, many pre-conditions are regarded as relative or absolute contraindications for lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). Radiculopathy is one among them. In Switzerland it is left to the surgeon's discretion when to operate if he adheres to a list of pre-defined indications. Contraindications, however, are less clearly specified. We hypothesized that, the extent of pre-operative radiculopathy results in different benefits for patients treated with mono-segmental lumbar TDR. We used patient perceived leg pain and its correlation with physician recorded radiculopathy for creating the patient groups to be compared.

METHODS

The present study is based on the dataset of SWISSspine, a government mandated health technology assessment registry. Between March 2005 and April 2009, 577 patients underwent either mono- or bi-segmental lumbar TDR, which was documented in a prospective observational multicenter mode. A total of 416 cases with a mono-segmental procedure were included in the study. The data collection consisted of pre-operative and follow-up data (physician based) and clinical outcomes (NASS form, EQ-5D). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted with patients' self-indicated leg pain and the surgeon-based diagnosis "radiculopathy", as marked on the case report forms. As a result, patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of leg pain. The two groups were compared with regard to the pre-operative patient characteristics and pre- and post-operative pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and quality of life using general linear modeling.

RESULTS

The optimal ROC model revealed a leg pain threshold of 40 ≤ VAS > 40 for the absence or the presence of "radiculopathy". Demographics in the resulting two groups were well comparable. Applying this threshold, the mean pre-operative leg pain level was 16.5 points in group 1 and 68.1 points in group 2 (p < 0.001). Back pain levels differed less with 63.6 points in group 1 and 72.6 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Pre-operative quality of life showed considerable differences with an 0.44 EQ-5D score in group 1 and 0.29 in group 2 (p < 0.001, possible score range -0.6 to 1). At a mean follow-up time of 8 months, group 1 showed a mean leg pain improvement of 3.6 points and group 2 of 41.1 points (p < 0.001). Back pain relief was 35.6 and 39.1 points, respectively (p = 0.27). EQ-5D score improvement was 0.27 in group 1 and 0.41 in group 2 (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients labeled as having radiculopathy (group 2) do mostly have pre-operative leg pain levels ≥ 40. Applying this threshold, the patients with pre-operative leg pain do also have more severe back pain and a considerably lower quality of life. Their net benefit from the lumbar TDR is higher and they do have similar post-operative back and leg pain levels as well as the quality of life as patients without pre-operative leg pain. Although randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings, they put leg pain and radiculopathy into perspective as absolute contraindications for TDR.

摘要

目的

目前,许多术前情况被视为腰椎全椎间盘置换术(TDR)的相对或绝对禁忌证。神经根病就是其中之一。在瑞士,如果外科医生遵循一系列预先定义的适应证,何时进行手术则由其自行决定。然而,禁忌证的规定则不太明确。我们假设,术前神经根病的程度会给接受单节段腰椎TDR治疗的患者带来不同的益处。我们利用患者自述的腿痛情况及其与医生记录的神经根病的相关性来划分待比较的患者组。

方法

本研究基于SWISSspine数据集,这是一个政府授权的卫生技术评估登记处。2005年3月至2009年4月期间,577例患者接受了单节段或双节段腰椎TDR手术,以前瞻性观察性多中心模式记录在案。本研究共纳入416例单节段手术病例。数据收集包括术前和随访数据(基于医生)以及临床结局(NASS表格、EQ-5D)。利用患者自述的腿痛情况和病例报告表上医生记录的“神经根病”诊断进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。结果,根据腿痛的严重程度将患者分为两组。使用一般线性模型比较两组患者的术前特征、术前和术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分以及生活质量。

结果

最佳ROC模型显示,“神经根病”有无的腿痛阈值为40≤VAS>40。最终两组的人口统计学特征具有良好的可比性。应用该阈值,第1组术前平均腿痛水平为16.5分,第2组为68.1分(p<0.001)。背痛水平差异较小,第1组为63.6分,第2组为72.6分(p<0.001)。术前生活质量存在显著差异,第1组EQ-5D评分为0.44,第2组为0.29(p<0.001,可能的评分范围为-0.6至1)。平均随访8个月时,第1组平均腿痛改善3.6分,第2组改善41.1分(p<0.001)。背痛缓解分别为35.6分和39.1分(p=0.27)。第1组EQ-5D评分改善0.27,第2组改善0.41(p=0.11)。

结论

被标记为患有神经根病的患者(第2组)术前腿痛水平大多≥40。应用该阈值,术前腿痛患者的背痛也更严重,生活质量显著更低。他们从腰椎TDR中获得的净益处更高,术后背痛和腿痛水平以及生活质量与术前无腿痛的患者相似。尽管需要随机对照试验来证实这些发现,但它们使腿痛和神经根病作为TDR的绝对禁忌证得到了重新审视。

相似文献

1
Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.术前腿部疼痛和神经根病对单节段腰椎全椎间盘置换术疗效的影响:一项全国性登记研究的结果
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S729-36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1863-x. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
2
Influence of preoperative nucleus pulposus status and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.单节段腰椎全椎间盘置换术后术前髓核状态和神经根病对疗效的影响:来自全国登记处的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Dec 2;12:275. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-275.
3
SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses.瑞士脊柱:一个用于腰椎间盘假体健康技术评估的全国性注册机构。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):851-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0934-8. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
4
Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.慢性下腰痛和椎间盘退变患者的全椎间盘置换与多学科康复治疗:一项随机对照多中心试验的8年随访
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1480-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Benchmarking in the SWISSspine registry: results of 52 Dynardi lumbar total disc replacements compared with the data pool of 431 other lumbar disc prostheses.SWISSspine 注册研究中的基准测试:52 枚 Dynardi 腰椎全椎间盘置换与 431 枚其他腰椎椎间盘假体数据池的比较结果。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1550-3. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
6
Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.瑞士脊柱注册中心腰椎间盘假体的五年随访结果。
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2114-26. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3418-4. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
Health-related quality of life in patients with surgically treated lumbar disc herniation: 2- and 7-year follow-up of 117 patients.手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者的健康相关生活质量:117 例患者的 2 年和 7 年随访。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):198-203. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566136. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
8
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
9
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
10
Comparative effectiveness research across two spine registries.两个脊柱注册研究的比较效果研究。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1640-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2256-5. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受脊柱手术患者的生活质量:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):67-76. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701104. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
2
We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.我们需要谈谈腰椎全椎间盘置换术。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):201-240. doi: 10.14444/5029. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Spinal motion preservation surgery: indications and applications.脊柱运动保留手术:适应证与应用
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2052-3. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Comparing Utility Scores in Common Spinal Radiculopathies: Results of a Prospective Valuation Study.比较常见神经根病的效用评分:一项前瞻性估值研究的结果。
Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):270-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563406. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
Maverick total disc replacement in a real-world patient population: a prospective, multicentre, observational study.现实患者群体中的非标准全椎间盘置换术:一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Sep;24(9):2047-55. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3918-x. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
6
ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.国际脊柱侧弯研究学会政策声明 - 腰椎人工椎间盘
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 12;9:7. doi: 10.14444/2007. eCollection 2015.
7
Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc.腰椎全椎间盘置换的适应证:为合适的全椎间盘选择具有合适适应证的合适患者。
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1012. eCollection 2014.
8
Positive Outcomes of Varicose Vein Surgery: The Patient Perspective.静脉曲张手术的积极结果:患者视角
Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0092-x.
9
Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.瑞士脊柱注册中心腰椎间盘假体的五年随访结果。
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2114-26. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3418-4. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
10
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.米歇尔·贝努瓦和罗伯特·马尔霍兰德年度《欧洲脊柱杂志》综述:对《欧洲脊柱杂志》2012年“外科手术与研究”文章的调查
Eur Spine J. 2013 Feb;22(2):250-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2630-3. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Sciatica.坐骨神经痛。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):241-52. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.005.
2
Sciatica: what the rheumatologist needs to know.坐骨神经痛:风湿科医生需要知道什么。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 Mar;6(3):139-45. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.3. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
3
SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses.瑞士脊柱:一个用于腰椎间盘假体健康技术评估的全国性注册机构。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):851-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0934-8. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
4
Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal.初次腰椎间盘切除术后复发性椎间盘突出症与长期背痛:有限与积极椎间盘切除术的疗效综述
Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2):338-44; discussion 344-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2.
5
Recurrence rate of lumbar disc herniation after open discectomy in active young men.活跃年轻男性行开放性椎间盘切除术后腰椎间盘突出症的复发率
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):24-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f9116.
6
Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.腰椎全椎间盘置换术的设计理念。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Dec;17(12):1635-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0811-x. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
7
Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.前瞻性、随机、多中心食品药品监督管理局关于CHARITE人工椎间盘与腰椎融合术治疗腰椎间盘置换的研究性器械豁免研究:五年随访
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):374-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
8
Prevalence of lumbar total disc replacement candidates in a community-based spinal surgery practice.社区脊柱外科实践中腰椎全椎间盘置换术候选者的患病率。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Apr;21(2):126-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180621589.
9
Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues.基于证据生成的覆盖范围:概念与政策问题审视
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):425-32. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307070651.
10
Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients.SB Charité腰椎间盘假体的并发症及再次手术:75例患者的经验
Eur Spine J. 2008 Jan;17(1):36-43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0506-8. Epub 2007 Oct 10.