Department of Health Science, The College at Brockport, State University of New York, Brockport, NY 14420-2976, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(6):519-29. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.523854.
There are few physical activity (PA) interventions in higher education, and they have been only minimally effective.
To determine if a course-based, peer education intervention was associated with increases in PA and physical fitness.
Participants were 178 students enrolled in a personal health class during the 2007-2008 academic year.
A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the effect of the intervention. Repeated measures analysis of covariance was employed to test the impact of the intervention on students' PA, body composition, waist-to-hip ratio, cardiovascular fitness, flexibility, and muscular strength.
Women in the treatment group classified as "Inactive" at baseline increased PA, whereas "Inactive" control women had reductions in PA. Women in the treatment group who were "Active" at baseline reduced their waist-to-hip ratio and increased flexibility. There were no differences by treatment group among men.
The intervention was effective in improving PA and physical fitness among college women.
背景:在高等教育中,几乎没有针对身体活动(PA)的干预措施,而且这些措施的效果也微乎其微。
目的:确定基于课程的同伴教育干预是否与身体活动和身体健康的增加有关。
参与者:参与者为 178 名在 2007-2008 学年期间参加个人健康课程的学生。
方法:使用准实验设计评估干预的效果。采用重复测量协方差分析来测试干预对学生身体活动、身体成分、腰臀比、心血管健康、柔韧性和肌肉力量的影响。
结果:基线时被归类为“不活跃”的治疗组女性增加了身体活动量,而对照组中“不活跃”的女性则减少了身体活动量。基线时“活跃”的治疗组女性降低了腰臀比并增加了柔韧性。男性在治疗组之间没有差异。
结论:该干预措施在提高女大学生的身体活动和身体健康方面是有效的。